Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines: Coming to a Workplace Near You?

31 August 2020 Blog
Authors: Ryan N. Parsons Carrie Hoffman Daniel A. Kaplan
Published To: Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business

Six months into the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, everyone is looking for hopeful signs that life can return to “normal” on any level.  Encouraging news reports indicate that the race to develop a COVID vaccine is progressing, with hopes that one will receive approval and become commercially available by early in 2021.  

With a vaccine comes some difficult questions for employers.  Can employers mandate a vaccine as a condition of employment?  Even if they can do so legally, should they?  

Can employers mandate a vaccine?  Probably, but with exceptions.

Private employers likely have the legal right to require employees to obtain a COVID vaccine as a condition of employment.  For years, many employers in high-risk workplaces (e.g., hospitals and nursing homes) have required their employees to obtain an annual flu vaccine.  This does not pose problems in the ordinary course.  Given the estimated 180,000 Americans (and counting) who have died from COVID, it seems unlikely that lawmakers will enact legislation that would preclude employers generally from mandating a COVID vaccine. 

With that said, employers may also have a legal duty under the Americans with Disabilities Act to allow certain employees to opt out of the vaccine.  For example, given the speed with which the vaccine candidates are moving through clinical trials, employees in high-risk categories may receive advice from their health care providers not to receive the vaccine at least initially until the complications are better understood.  Alternatively, perhaps young, healthy employees who are at relatively low risk from COVID may obtain notes indicating that the vaccine is not necessary for their own health.

If employees request an accommodation from an employer’s COVID vaccine mandate, the employer will need to determine whether the accommodation is a reasonable one and whether it imposes an undue burden on operations and on the health and safety of coworkers.  As with all ADA accommodation requests, employers will need to carefully consider the facts on a case-by-case basis.

Additionally, employees may object to the vaccine on religious grounds.  Again, employers must balance employees’ right to be free from religious discrimination against the burden that the accommodation would create in the workplace.  (Note that the Supreme Court has stated that employers have less obligation to accommodate employees’ religious objections than their medical needs.  In religious discrimination cases, the employer can deny the request if it imposes more than a minimal burden on the business.)

Should employers mandate a vaccine?  It depends.

As the legal rules above suggest, implementing a mandatory vaccine program will likely require employers to devote considerable time and energy to the program.  In addition to dealing with accommodation requests, employers will need to decide questions such as:

  • Who pays for the vaccine?  (Many employers and insurers subsidize employee flu shots and provide them on-site to minimize the burden on employees.  However, it remains to be seen how expensive a COVID vaccine will be and whether the government will issue any rules on how it is allocated in the early going.)
  • How should employees prove they received the vaccine?
  • Assuming the vaccine eventually wears off, how frequently will employees be required to get the vaccine?
  • Do remote-work employees need to get vaccinated?

In addition, employers who mandate a vaccine will need to consider the potential liability that arises from doing so.  What happens if an employee has a severe reaction to the vaccine and then argues that he would not have gotten the vaccine except that his employer required it?  Could the employer be held liable because of the mandatory vaccine policy?  It’s difficult to say right now, but employers cannot simply ignore this possibility.

Ultimately, this will likely involve risk balancing.  For employers that cannot effectively socially distance and those who work with high-risk populations, a mandate probably makes sense to minimize the risk of a COVID outbreak.  (For example, imagine a nursing home not requiring a vaccine and then experiencing a spread of COVID through its elderly population.  Hindsight being 20/20, it would be easy to say that the employer should have mandated a COVID vaccine.)  For other employers, the risks may outweigh the benefits, especially in the first few months after a vaccine is released.

Stay tuned

For now, the questions remain hypothetical.  Until a vaccine is made available and we have more information about its efficacy and risk factors, it is difficult to answer these questions in a vacuum.  Nevertheless, employers ought to start thinking about their proposed approach to COVID vaccinations so that they are ready to implement a plan when the time comes (hopefully in the not-too-distant future).

Companies in all sectors of the economy continue to be impacted by COVID-19. Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short- and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives. Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to deliver timely perspectives on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus. Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services