A Shield for Employers: State COVID-19 Indemnity Laws

30 November 2020 Blog
Author(s): Brooke C. Bahlinger Carrie Hoffman
Published To: Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Labor & Employment Law Perspectives

At this point, employers and employees alike have adjusted to the new working environment that is COVID-19. With the number of positive cases recently on the rise, employers are growing more concerned about exposure to COVID-19-related liability. And they should be. Although some lawsuits filed against large employers have since been dismissed, new lawsuits against employers making claims regarding COVID-19 in the workplace are still being filed.

But there is hope. Back in June, we reported on a number of states that had passed, or were considering passing, legislation aimed at limiting COVID-19 liability for employers.  Now, as 2020 nears its end, and recognizing that lawsuits related to the pandemic will continue, even more states are passing indemnity laws seeking to protect employers from exposure to civil liability.

In October, for example, Michigan passed an indemnification law that aims to protect employers from liability due to COVID-19 exposure. Michigan’s law protects employers provided they comply with “all federal, state, and local statutes, rules, regulations, executive orders, and agency orders related to COVID-19.” Other states, including Georgia, Iowa (providing a cause of action when one of the following applies: (1) the injury resulted in a COVID-19 diagnosis that resulted in inpatient hospitalization or death, (2) the act was intended to cause harm, or (3) the act constitutes actual malice), Kansas (whose law expires on January 26, 2021), Mississippi, Nevada (whose law expires on the latter of the termination of the state’s declared emergency or July 1, 2023), Tennessee, and Wisconsin (providing indemnity for certain health care professionals and manufacturers, distributors, and sellers of emergency medical suppliers who sell to charitable organizations or a government unit) have also joined the list of states that have passed some variation of employer indemnity laws.

Other states, however, have taken the path of protecting employers by expanding workers’ compensation protections. New Jersey’s workers’ compensation bill, if passed, will create a rebuttable presumption of coverage. An employer may rebut the presumption by proving – by a preponderance of evidence—that the employee was not exposed to the virus while working in the place of employment. (However, employers should tread carefully, as coverage under the workers’ compensation system serves to limit employer liability.)

It should be noted that many indemnity laws, like New Jersey’s workers’ compensation law, remain pending. Additionally, states like Arizona, Rhode Island, Ohio (House Bill 606 (which states an effective date of December 16, 2020, but has yet to be signed by the governor) and Senate Bill 308), and New York, have introduced but have not yet passed legislation.

In light of states providing employers with protection from liability directly stemming from COVID-19 exposure, employers should still be aware that employment discrimination claims are gaining traction. For example, a new class action lawsuit against Amazon was filed on November 12  in federal court in New York, alleging not only that the retailer put employees’ health and safety at risk, but that it also discriminated against minority employees by exposing them to COVID-19 through inferior conditions of employment. Although these state indemnity laws act to shield employers from tort-like claims, employers are still responsible for ensuring there are no discriminatory acts or practices that result in employees in a protected class being treated less favorably—even when the focus may otherwise be health and safety.

Employers who do find themselves named in a COVID-19-related lawsuit should consider the defense strategies asserted here.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services