Human Rights and Forced Labor Sanctions Announced

24 March 2021 Renewable Energy Outlook Blog
Author(s): David W. Simon Gregory Husisian Christopher Swift Jeffery R. Atkin

Earlier this week, the United States, the European Union, Britain, and Canada imposed sanctions on several Chinese officials for human rights abuses against the Uyghur minority in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). China promptly retaliated. Although the U.S. has sanctioned Chinese companies and individuals in connection with allegations of forced labor and human rights abuses in the past, most notably through the use of the Department of Commerce’s entity list, this is the first instance in which U.S. allies have leveled sanctions of their own simultaneously in a coordinated rollout. This is consistent with President Biden’s early promise to enlist allies to confront China. In this instance, the Treasury Department sanctioned two Chinese officials, one a former Deputy Party Secretary in Xinjiang and the other the Director of the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau. The EU and Britain sanctioned two additional individuals. Canada’s sanctions were the first imposed on China since the 1989 crackdown on protestors in Tiananmen Square. China immediately retaliated by sanctioning ten European individuals and four institutions.

The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security has been preventing U.S. exports to Chinese companies and individuals associated with forced labor and human rights abuses in Xinjiang since the end of 2019, and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control began sanctioning individuals in Xinjiang under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act in 2020. We expect the U.S. and allies to continue to sanction forced labor and human rights abuses for the foreseeable future, and we expect those sanctions to cover an ever-broadening group of entities and individuals. Similarly, this week’s incidence of tit-for-tat sanctions will likely be repeated and escalated.

This will impact multinational companies doing business in the U.S., Europe, and China. Because China has denounced allegations of human rights abuses in the XUAR as “lies and disinformation,” it is likely that tensions will continue to mount, placing multinational companies in the difficult position of facing U.S., EU, British, and Canadian sanctions related to Chinese operations and Chinese sanctions related to non-Chinese business activities. We expect the impact on supply chains to increase over time, and disruptions will begin to manifest themselves more frequently.

These U.S. sanctions are also consistent with larger U.S. government efforts to protect the integrity of supply chains. Companies should take steps to ensure that they are conducting proper supply chain due diligence and implementing effective compliance programs. In particular, companies should review due diligence best practices and closely reexamine their supply chains with the knowledge that the U.S. and its allies are focused on human rights and forced labor issues in Xinjiang.

Foley & Lardner’s International Trade & National Security practice can help companies navigate this maze of sanctions. Its partners include former officials from the Office of Foreign Asset Control, which administers Treasury Department sanctions, and the Department of Commerce, which has used the entity list to deter human rights abuses in Xinjiang. Foley & Lardner’s Federal Public Affairs practice can provide companies with up-to-the-minute information about legislative trends, including the introduction of a bill that would formally ban companies from using materials prepared with false labor. Working together, Foley & Lardner is well-positioned to help companies determine their supply chain needs and work to mitigate supply chain disruption.

Should you wish to discuss these topics, please contact Dennis Cardoza or Jared Rifis in the Federal Public Affairs practice; David Simon, Greg Husisian, Christopher Swift, or Mike Walsh in the International Trade & National Security practice; and Jeff Atkin in the Energy practice.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services