They Said They Would, and So They Did: DOL Formally Withdraws Joint Employer Regulations

09 August 2021 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Authors: Jessica Glatzer Mason

Joint employment continues to be a hot-button issue, especially as many companies look to contingent workforces to provide flexibility as businesses reopen in this uncertain economic landscape.  Joint employment is found where two different businesses share control and supervision of employees in a workforce.  From time to time, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has issued guidance to help employers navigate this landscape of shared control—and shared liability.  

To that end, in March 2020, the DOL released its proposal to rescind the joint employer regulations that were issued in January 2020 during the Trump administration.  On July 30, 2021, the DOL issued its formal proposal to rescind the guidance and remove the regulations established by the January 2020 rule, effective September 28, 2021.

The 2020 rule was controversial—while it enjoyed strong support from business communities that enjoyed increased protections from being deemed a joint employer, numerous states challenged the rule.  In the meantime, federal courts have chimed in, including one that struck down core elements of the rule, which in turn influenced the Biden administration’s decision to withdraw the guidance. Importantly, the DOL has not proposed an alternative rule at this time.

The result of the withdrawal is a return to the pre-2020 common law regime created by a patchwork of cases, with rules and outcomes varying by jurisdiction. While the DOL may propose an alternative rule for joint employment, the department has not indicated any intent to do so in the near term.

Employers, especially those who rely on staffing agency personnel, should impose additional oversight to ensure these employees are being paid and managed properly.  Under traditional joint employment analysis, both businesses that supervise or control an employee can be liable for any penalties resulting from noncompliance.  Companies can act now by reviewing state and federal wage and hour rules to ensure compliance as well as contracting for indemnification between joint employer parties.  Because penalties for noncompliance are steep, especially with regard to wage and hour noncompliance, employers should brush up on local law to ensure compliance before the effective date of September 28, 2021.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services