Payvider: The Blurring of the Lines Between Payer and Provider in Digital Health Deals

20 October 2021 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Christopher J. Donovan

Hosted by the Health Plan Alliance, I was joined by Ken Barrette, Managing Director of Health Care at Alvarez and Marsal, and Marshall Votta, Operating Partner at Nautic Partners, to discuss the unique opportunities that provider-owned health plans are seeing in becoming players in the tech-enabled provider space as plans are shedding their historic roles of risk bearer and aggregator to embrace value-based care and make the necessary investments and innovation needed to succeed in that world.

The panel noted that virtually every major commercial insurer has an active venture investment arm, and many plans now attribute close to 50% of their revenue to non-traditional premium-based insurance products including care management, data analytics, risk management consulting, and outright provider ownership or management.

But both challenges and opportunities abound on the provider-side for plans.

Opportunities include: Rich with data, plans are in a unique position to predict and guide outcomes, care delivery and care navigation to the lowest most cost effective setting for an affiliated provider. Plans in many cases have the large national or regional platform of infrastructure to roll out a new delivery model across a broad network to make an offering attractive to members. Plans understand what payers will be looking for in terms of provider delivery and quality clinical care metrics. Plans have access to capital and can provide valuable strategic insight into provider-side acquisitions at the same time as quickly integrating a provider into their network.

Challenges include: Plans may find themselves absorbing losses on early stage growth (but promising) tech companies, hiring adequate human capital to monitor investments and, if needed, management for them; balancing minority and majority control positions with professional investors who may have different financial and liquidity objectives and governance styles; addressing conflicts between parent providers and newly-acquired providers that may compete with or negatively impact a parent of a plan; building adequate firewalls to inhibit the flow of confidential information addressed by antitrust laws; and finally, of course, being sensitive to fraud and abuse implications of referrals generated by vertical integration.

Given these opportunities and challenges—how best to invest? Buy, build, or partner? Selecting an area in which a plan has substantive need (and perhaps plan side expertise) as an initial matter is optimal to target opportunities that fit the need. Greater investment entails greater ability to influence a target but of course entails greater financial risk. Operating a provider also entails a fundamentally new skill set and need for new management from a plan. Many plans have taken an approach of either making minority direct investments in targets to learn an area or invest in a series of opportunities as a limited partner in a health care venture capital (VC) or private equity (PE) fund. Managing winners and losers across a broad portfolio of assets entails a unique skill set that may not be typically housed in risk bearing entities; therefore, many plans hire in this talent or outsource it to VC and PE funds.

However plans decide, one thing is certain: digital health investment is here to stay, is part of the new health care playbook for all players, and must be included in any plan strategy whatever the investment format. Simply contracting to shift risk to providers alone will not be sufficient. Total funding in digital health through Q3 has already surpassed all of ’20, a big year in itself, at $3.1Billion. Behavioral Health and home care lead the way in that number but new disruptive models continue to roll out in the risk allocation space, evidenced by several new models for provider /plan risk sharing. Plans will increasingly look to vertically diversify as technology and value-based care combine with consumerism in a new age for health care.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.