FQHCs: Proposed Guidance Addresses Health Center Delivery of Telehealth Services

03 October 2022 Health Care Law Today Blog
Author(s): Adam J. Hepworth

The federal government is requesting comments on proposed guidance for federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that provide services via telehealth. The guidance communicates key criteria for ensuring services delivered via telehealth remain within the health center’s Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-approved scope of project, and therefore qualify for benefits such as Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) coverage, 340B discount drug pricing, and enhanced Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.

The proposed guidance was issued for comment on September 15, 2022 by HRSA, the component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that oversees health centers. The guidance applies to FQHCs that receive federal grants under the Public Health Service Act, as well as FQHC look-alikes that meet HRSA requirements but do not receive federal grants. Comments are due on or before November 14, 2022.

Existing Health Center Program Requirements Apply to Telehealth Services

The proposed guidance sets forth HRSA’s view that telehealth is a means for delivering health services to patients using telecommunications technology or equipment. Because telehealth is not considered a type of service, it does not need to be approved by an FQHC’s HRSA project officer and listed on the Form 5A. However, the proposed guidance emphasizes that all existing health center program requirements apply when services are delivered via telehealth.

Many of the requirements noted by the proposed guidance could be implemented through appropriate policies and procedures. For example, health centers using telehealth must delineate key roles and responsibilities for health center staff, such as the responsibility for obtaining informed consent from patients to receive services by telehealth, and the responsibility for informing patients of the ability to opt out of receiving services via telehealth. Health centers must also ensure they can bill and apply sliding fee discounts to patients receiving care via telehealth, and meet all relevant licensure and scope-of-practice rules. 

Regulatory Barriers Pose Challenges for Providing Telehealth Services to Geographically Distant Patients

The proposed guidance clarifies that FQHCs must ensure patients who receive services via telehealth have reasonable access to the health center’s full scope of services for the telehealth care to fall within the HRSA-approved scope of project. This requirement potentially increases complexities for FQHCs interested in delivering services in geographic areas where they do not have a physical presence.

Exacerbating this issue is the rule outlined in the proposed guidance that telehealth services will be considered within an FQHC’s scope of project only when delivered to patients who either have previously presented for care at a health center site or satisfy a detailed set of criteria, including a requirement to be physically located within the health center’s service area. This restriction sharply limits the ability of an FQHC to deliver in-scope services to a geographically distant patient—even if the FQHC has special expertise in providing care for the particular patient’s health condition or community.

FQHCs May Contract for Telehealth Services

The proposed guidance does not expressly address contracting for telehealth services, leaving HRSA’s ordinary guidance on FQHC contracting undisturbed.  Partnering with a local health center may offer one viable alternative for a geographically distant FQHC to leverage its specialized expertise to reach new patients via technology without losing the benefits of FQHC status.  

If you are interested in submitting comments on HRSA’s proposed guidance for health centers delivering services via telehealth, please reach out to the author, your Foley relationship partner, or to our Health Care Practice Group with any questions.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.