In litigation to establish inventorship of the CRISPR gene editing technique, the Fed. Circuit provided additional guidance on how to determine when conception of an invention has occurred.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2338726?nl_pk=95cd90ef-6b5f-45a4-a80b-037d2c8892f4&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip&utm_content=2025-05-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=0?copied=1
“The appropriate analysis should turn on whether [CVC’s] scientists ‘had formed the idea of their use for that purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice’ — more than a ‘general hope,’ but less than knowing with certainty that the invention would work.”

Author(s)
Related Insights
February 18, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Automatic Cash-Out Limits Under SECURE 2.0: Should Your Retirement Plan Adopt the $7,000 Threshold?
The required amendment adoption date for many of the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0) provisions is December 31, 2026. While plan…
February 18, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Opening the Door to Alternative Investments in 401(k) Plans: Fiduciary Risks, Regulatory Shifts, and Practical Realities
Employers may begin fielding questions from employees on why the company’s 401(k) plan does not offer alternative investments such as…
February 16, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Trump Administration Repeals Endangerment Finding: Why, and What Next?
Summary of Action Enacting what it called the “single largest deregulatory action in U.S. history”, on February 12, 2026, U.S….