In litigation to establish inventorship of the CRISPR gene editing technique, the Fed. Circuit provided additional guidance on how to determine when conception of an invention has occurred.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2338726?nl_pk=95cd90ef-6b5f-45a4-a80b-037d2c8892f4&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip&utm_content=2025-05-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=0?copied=1
“The appropriate analysis should turn on whether [CVC’s] scientists ‘had formed the idea of their use for that purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice’ — more than a ‘general hope,’ but less than knowing with certainty that the invention would work.”

Author(s)
Related Insights
June 13, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Eighth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment to Insurer in Dispute with Construction Project Owner Over Lost Rental Income
On Monday, June 9, 2025, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Missouri real estate developer could not recover insurance…
June 13, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Your Company Received an ICE Notice of Inspection — Now What?
“Worksite enforcement operations are going to massively expand,” according to a June 12, 2025, interview[1] with Border Czar Tom Homan….
June 12, 2025
Legal News: International Trade Enforcement & Compliance
Tips for Avoiding Investigations of Business Fraud in India
Fraud continues to pose significant challenges across industries worldwide. For multinational companies operating in India, the country offers enormous opportunity — but also presents distinct operational and regulatory risks that require executive-level attention and strategic oversight.