As companies eye opportunities to invest in and locate new business, technology, and cutting-edge R&D in China, the implementation of the Third Amendment to China’s patent law will have a significant impact on your business transactions and IP portfolio management.
This Foley Web conference in our Global Marketplace — Eye on China: Web Series, explored how companies can successfully implement and integrate IP and business strategies in light of the changes brought about by the Third Amendment.
Specific topics included:
- Promoting increased technology R&D in China — Does the Third Amendment aid or impede this trend?
- The import/export of technology to/from China through licensing or sale transactions: What new issues will arise in the wake of the Third Amendment?
- Protecting IP through nondisclosure agreements and noncompete provisions in labor law
- Will the Third Amendment stimulate further development of the manufacturing sector in China?
Moderator:
- Catherine Sun: Foley Shanghai Office Managing Partner and Asia Practice Chair
Speakers:
- Roger Martin: Qualcomm Senior Vice President and Chief IP Strategist
- Jon W. Dudas: Foley Partner and former Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO
- Ken Duck: Foley Senior Counsel and member of the firm’s China and International practices and Automotive Industry Team
- Yan Zhao: Foley Senior Counsel and member of the firm’s International and Electronics practices and Automotive Industry Team
Related Insights
21 March 2025
IP Litigation Current
Federal Circuit Opens the Door to Additional Domestic Industry Investment: “Ordinary Importer” No Longer
In its recent decision in Lashify, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, the Federal Circuit opened the door for patent owners to include expanded categories of domestic investment to satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under Section 337(a)(3)(B).
21 March 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Federal Court Rejects FCA’s “65%-100%” Language as Insufficient to Constitute the Necessary Quantity Term in a Requirements Contract—A Win for Suppliers
A recent federal court decision marks an important win for automotive suppliers in the ongoing debate over what constitutes a valid requirements contract under Michigan law following the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in MSSN, Inc. v. Airboss Flexible Products Co. (2023).
27 April 2025
Events
Innovative Payment Strategies in Proton Therapy: Addressing Challenges and Driving Value
Foley partner Kinal Patel is speaking at the 2025 National Proton Conference in a panel titled “Innovative Payment Strategies in Proton Therapy: Addressing Challenges and Driving Value” on April 27.