As one of the most significant developments in computing in recent years, cloud computing has become synonymous with corporate efficiency and flexibility. Industry experts are only beginning to realize the impact of cloud computing on the business environment. In this session, leading experts will discuss opportunities for growth and investment in cloud computing. Our panel will evaluate the impact of the cloud and whether it really represents a dynamic change in computing operations or a small shift in the status quo. We will examine the common risks and rewards associated with cloud computing, its impact on venture investing, and expectations for growth in the cloud business.
Moderator:
David W. Kantaros, Partner, Foley & Lardner LLP
Panelists:
David W. Baum, Partner, Stage 1 Ventures
John Landry, Manager, Lead Dog Ventures
Ralph Rodriguez, Chief Executive Officer and Founder, Delfigo Security
Related Insights
24 July 2025
Events
ACI's Inaugural Summit on GLP-1 Law & Policy
Foley partner Kyle Faget, co-chair of the firm’s Medical Devices Area of Focus, is speaking in American Conference Institute’s Inaugural Summit on GLP-1 Law & Policy on July 24.
23 April 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Company Should Know About…Tariff Strategies for Sell-Side Contracts
With the size and scope of President Trump’s tariffs continuing to shift, this is a critical time for businesses to assess their contracts and determine how increased tariff costs might adversely affect profitability, and whether there are any strategies to mitigate the losses.
22 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
Health Care Marketing: The Seventh Circuit Addresses “Referrals” Under The Anti-Kickback Statute
The case, United States v. Sorenson, addressed whether a Medicare-registered distributor violated the AKS in making payments to advertising, marketing, and manufacturing companies that worked to sell orthopedic braces to Medicare patients. The court held that such payments were not “referrals” within the meaning of the AKS because the payments were made to entities that were neither physicians in a position to refer their patients nor other decisionmakers in positions to “leverage fluid, informal power and influence” over health care decisions.