On April 30, 2007 the United States Supreme Court handed down an important decision on the scope of obviousness under 35 USC § 103.
Although the case concerned the placement of an electronic control, (i.e., a throttle control) on a vehicle control pedal, language in the decision could affect on the scope afforded claims drawn to computer implemented inventions, such as automated systems and business method patents.
Applying a “teaching, suggestion, motivation test” the Federal Circuit had reversed a District Court’s finding that a claimed vehicle control pedal was obvious.
Read the complete article by clicking on the link below.
Reprinted with permission from Portfolio Media, Inc.
Author(s)
Related Insights
March 11, 2026
Tariff & International Trade Resource
What Every Multinational Should Know About…Managing the Aftermath of the Supreme Court’s IEEPA Tariff Decision (Part III)
The importer of record is the entity that initially pays all tariffs and thus is the entity that would receive any IEEPA tariff refunds. Nonetheless, behind the scenes there often are a variety of mechanisms importers of record may have used to handle the often unexpected tariffs, including pushing back on suppliers for price concessions, using surcharges to pass along tariffs, or generally increasing price. In many cases, other parties may be looking to share any potential refunds.
March 11, 2026
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
How Supply Chain Mapping Strengthens Supply Chain Integrity
The last six years have brought vast changes in the U.S. regulatory landscape (e.g., tariff volatility, new supply chain integrity rules), unprecedented raw material shortages, and a global pandemic, just to list a few high-profile examples. This has led to unprecedented supply chain unpredictability.
March 10, 2026
The Path & The Practice
Episode 133: Casey Knapp, Partner
This episode of The Path & The Practice features a conversation with Marshall Keen, a summer associate in Foley’s Dallas office.