Waiting is the Hardest Part: Despite Physician's 'Obstructive' Behavior and Refusal to Cooperate, Hearing Officer Lacks Authority to Terminate Peer Review Hearing
May 1, 2009
Shirley P. Morrigan and Nathaniel M. Lacktman analyze the recent California Supreme Court decision in Mileikowsky v. West Hills Hospital & Medical Center and offer advice for medical staff peer review bodies in light of the ruling.
Reprinted with permission from the California Society of Health Law Attorneys. Article first appeared in the Spring 2009 issue of California Health Law News.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 12, 2025
Health Care Law Today
Eleventh Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Landmark Constitutional Challenge to False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provisions
On December 12, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit heard oral argument in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical…
December 11, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Antitrust Risks and Compliance Strategies in Intellectual Property Portfolio Management
This article analyzes how intellectual property portfolio management can simultaneously promote innovation and present potential…
December 11, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
CARB Releases Proposed Regulations for SB 261 and 253
On December 9, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) released its proposed regulatory text for the initial regulations…