Litigation Committee's Recommendation Rejected Amid Concerns Regarding Independence and Reasonableness of Investigation
April 5, 2010
Foley Partner Gardner Davis and Associate Joanna White authored an article that appeared in the April 5, 2010 issue of the Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter titled “Special Litigation Committee’s Recommendation Rejected Amid Concerns Regarding Independence And Reasonableness of Investigation.” The authors examine the possible impact of the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in London v. Tyrell, stating that the message of the case is that directors should not serve on special litigation committees (SLC) unless prepared to deliver bad news to the company and the defendant directors. They add that members of an SLC must avoid the appearance of divided loyalties if the company wants the court to honor an SLC recommendation.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 18, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…
December 18, 2025
Innovative Technology Insights
Data Centers: The Role of AI and Semiconductors in Transforming an Industry
Data Centers: The Role of AI and Semiconductors in Transforming an Industry Key Takeaways AI is driving unprecedented demand for data…
December 18, 2025
Energy Current
Texas Energy Arbitration Disputes
Key Takeaways Texas courts enforce arbitration agreements strictly as written, making precise drafting critical.Incorporating AAA or…