Foley Partner Richard Stoll authored an article that examines the practicality of rule deadlines imposed upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), saying that EPA regulations issued with undue haste are often full of ambiguities and gaps that can potentially create confusion and result in judicial reversal. Stoll notes that rushed rules can also result in the omission of critical scientific, economic and technical factors, calling into question whether EPA deadline suits have outlived their usefulness.
Click here to read the complete article.
Author(s)
Related Insights
July 11, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Department of Justice Launches Program to Reward Antitrust Whistleblowers with Shares of Criminal Fines
On July 8, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (“Antitrust Division”) announced a new “Whistleblower Rewards…
July 23, 2025
Events
Healthcare Supply Chain Compliance Challenges: Vendor Management, Contract Negotiation, Tariff Impact
Foley partner Monica Chmielewski, vice chair of the firm’s Health Care Practice Group, is speaking in Strafford’s upcoming webinar titled “Healthcare Supply Chain Compliance Challenges: Vendor Management, Contract Negotiation, Tariff Impact” on July 23.
September 30, 2025
Events
FDA Regulation of AI-Enabled Medical Devices
Foley partner Kyle Faget, co-chair of the firm’s Medical Devices Area of Focus, is speaking at the American Bar Association Health Law Section’s Healthcare Delivery & Innovation Conference on September 30.