Partner Richard Stoll authored an article published in Bloomberg BNA: Daily Environment Report on May 16, 2014, titled “Protection of Judicial Review Watered Down in D.C. Circuit.” In the article Stoll highlighted the harsh results for regulated parties stemming from the recent ruling by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA. In that ruling, the court refused to entertain an industry challenge to a final rule provision that had not first been proposed, because the industry parties had not objected to the un-proposed rule provision during the public comment period. The final rule provisions thus remain in full force and effect. As Stoll commented, industry parties can now be punished for their “failures of telepathy and/or prophesy.”
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 10, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Fall Meeting Update: Climate and Resiliency (EX) Task Force
The mission of the Climate and Resiliency (EX) Task Force is to serve as the coordinating NAIC body for discussion and engagement on…
December 9, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Fall Meeting Update: Reinsurance (E) Task Force Discusses Implementation of Actuarial Guideline LV for Testing Adequacy of Reserves in Life Reinsurance
On December 9, 2025, the Reinsurance (E) Task Force, which reports to the Financial Condition (E) Committee, met to discuss, among other…
December 9, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
NAIC Fall Meeting Update: Third-Party Data and Models (H) Working Group Exposes Risk-Based Regulatory Framework for Third-Party Data and Model Vendors
On December 9, 2025, the Third-Party Data and Models (H) Working Group, which reports to the Innovation Cybersecurity and Technology (H)…