Partner Richard Stoll authored an article published in Bloomberg BNA: Daily Environment Report on May 16, 2014, titled “Protection of Judicial Review Watered Down in D.C. Circuit.” In the article Stoll highlighted the harsh results for regulated parties stemming from the recent ruling by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Utility Air Regulatory Group (UARG) v. EPA. In that ruling, the court refused to entertain an industry challenge to a final rule provision that had not first been proposed, because the industry parties had not objected to the un-proposed rule provision during the public comment period. The final rule provisions thus remain in full force and effect. As Stoll commented, industry parties can now be punished for their “failures of telepathy and/or prophesy.”
Author(s)
Related Insights
July 28, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Texas Enacts Critical Real Estate Reforms—Senate Bills 15, 17, 840
Prior to his June 22, 2025, deadline, Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed into law hundreds of bills passed by the Texas Legislature.
July 28, 2025
Tariff & International Trade Resource
FinCEN Exercises New Authority Targeting Mexico-Based Financial Institutions to Counter Cartel-Linked Fentanyl Trade
On June 25, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network at the U.S. Department of the Treasury designated three Mexico-based financial institutions as primary money laundering concerns under Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act.
July 25, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Thorny Laws That ICHRA Vendors Should Consider, Part Three: FinTech Edition
We continue our series on the legal and regulatory challenges facing individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements (ICHRAs); this…