Partner Harold Wegner was quoted in a Reuters article published on June 3, 2014, titled “U.S. Supreme Court Rulings May Make Life Harder for Patent Trolls.” The article discussed the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to vacate an appeals court decision in the case, Nautilus v. Biosig, which was being used to raise the bar on how much detail needs to be in a patent to avoid charges of being “indefinite.” According to Wegner, that ruling was the first since 1942 where the Supreme Court addressed the issue of how unclear, or “indefinite,” a patent could be before it would be deemed invalid.
Related News
December 24, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget on HHS Gender-Affirming Care Declaration – Impact is 'Enormous'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on the recent Department of Health and Human Services declaration rejecting gender-affirming care in the STAT News article, “Nineteen states, D.C. sue HHS over gender-affirming care crackdown."
December 22, 2025
In the News
Monica Call in Law.com Leadership Spotlight – 'I see my role as both coach and advocate'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Monica Call reflects on leadership, mentorship, and strategy in Law.com's "How I Made It Office Managing Partner" series.
December 18, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on HHS Proposed Rule Limiting Gender-Affirming Care
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Law360 article, “HHS Proposes Hospital Ban On Gender Care For Minors.”