Partner Larry Vernaglia was quoted in a Modern Healthcare article, “Key Justices Hard to Read in King v. Burwell Arguments,” on March 4, 2015. The article provided an analysis after the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in King v. Burwell, which involves the language around subsidies in The Affordable Care Act. Vernaglia said that deciding that the law is ambiguous would be, “a way to resolve the case, but also would be an unfortunate outcome if the court wants finality, which it appears they do.”
People
Related News
June 26, 2025
In the News
Alejandro Gomez-Strozzi on Mexico-US Auto Parts Trade – 'Going forward, there is nothing but integration'
Foley & Lardner lLP partner Alejandro Gómez-Strozzi shared insights on foreign direct investment around Mexico's automotive parts sector in the El Economista article, "Efecto Trump pega más a IED en autopartes que en autos y camiones."
June 25, 2025
In the News
Jocelyn Lavallo Explores Nuclear's Emerging Role in Project Finance
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Jocelyn Lavallo examined the increasing relevance of advanced nuclear technologies in the evolving clean energy landscape in her Environment+Energy Leader article, "Nuclear’s Emerging Role in Project Finance: A Cross-Technology Perspective."
June 25, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Comments on AI, User Fees Ahead of MDUFA Negotiations
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget weighed in on the role of user fees and artificial intelligence as stakeholders prepare for the next Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA) reauthorization in the Medtech Insight article, "Will Kennedy And Makary Come To Terms On User Fees During Next Round Of MDUFA Negotiations?"