Davis Discusses P&G Activist Nelson Peltz, Overloaded Board of Directors
August 5, 2017
The Street
Partner Gardner Davis was quoted in a The Street article, “Peltz’s Battle Puts Spotlight on P&G’s Director Problem,” discussing investor Nelson Peltz and his activist attack on Procter & Gamble’s (P&G) board of directors.
Peltz is currently arguing that P&G’s directors are too overcommitted to devote attention to his campaign to join the board. According to BoardEx, P&G’s directors serve on average of 2.63 public boards, which is well above the average of 2.01 directorships for S&P 500 corporations.
Davis explained that although P&G’s directors “certainly have a lot of time commitments” because they serve on the boards for ‘A list’ companies, independent directors should serve on exactly two big public corporate boards if they want to maximize productivity. “Being on the boards of two different large cap board will help develop ideas. You will learn from the other directors and see how they react and bring those ideas to bear on company two,” he said.
The Street continues on by reporting that Peltz currently serves as a director for four other major public corporations and would likely need to step down in order to successfully serve on P&G’s. Davis commented on this by explaining “it is unfair to attack Peltz as overboarded because for him, this is his day job.”
Peltz is currently arguing that P&G’s directors are too overcommitted to devote attention to his campaign to join the board. According to BoardEx, P&G’s directors serve on average of 2.63 public boards, which is well above the average of 2.01 directorships for S&P 500 corporations.
Davis explained that although P&G’s directors “certainly have a lot of time commitments” because they serve on the boards for ‘A list’ companies, independent directors should serve on exactly two big public corporate boards if they want to maximize productivity. “Being on the boards of two different large cap board will help develop ideas. You will learn from the other directors and see how they react and bring those ideas to bear on company two,” he said.
The Street continues on by reporting that Peltz currently serves as a director for four other major public corporations and would likely need to step down in order to successfully serve on P&G’s. Davis commented on this by explaining “it is unfair to attack Peltz as overboarded because for him, this is his day job.”
People
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.