Senior Counsel Katie Catanese was quoted in a Law360 article, “Del. Justices Urged To Remand S. China Livestock Case,” when she argued before the Delaware Supreme Court that a lower court judge had erred when he tossed claims in a summary judgment motion against the former executive of a failed Chinese livestock company.
Catanese represents the court-appointed receiver for Southern China Livestock Inc., who is suing Shu Kaneko, a former executive and director at the company, for breach of fiduciary duty, alleging that Kaneko stole more than $2.35 million from investors before the newly formed company “went dark” and stopped reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
She told the three-judge panel that the lower court ruling incorrectly rejected arguments that Southern China Livestock received any value for impermissibly taken shares of the company. Those shares were allegedly returned to secure the release of fraudulent transfer claims and other allegations against Kaneko.
“We ask that Kaneko not be able to use the release that he’s attempting to use in this case as a cloak to avoid liability here,” she said. “We believe there are strong issues of fact regarding the fraudulent transfers and, most importantly, the value of the consideration or the alleged consideration supporting the release.”
Catanese represents the court-appointed receiver for Southern China Livestock Inc., who is suing Shu Kaneko, a former executive and director at the company, for breach of fiduciary duty, alleging that Kaneko stole more than $2.35 million from investors before the newly formed company “went dark” and stopped reporting to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
She told the three-judge panel that the lower court ruling incorrectly rejected arguments that Southern China Livestock received any value for impermissibly taken shares of the company. Those shares were allegedly returned to secure the release of fraudulent transfer claims and other allegations against Kaneko.
“We ask that Kaneko not be able to use the release that he’s attempting to use in this case as a cloak to avoid liability here,” she said. “We believe there are strong issues of fact regarding the fraudulent transfers and, most importantly, the value of the consideration or the alleged consideration supporting the release.”
People
Related News
July 11, 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Assess Critical IP Considerations for Emerging Medical Device Companies
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys Shabbi Khan, Nate Beaver, Austin Kim, and Jeff Simon authored the Med Device Online article, "Critical Considerations For IP & Patents For Emerging Medical Device Companies."
July 11, 2025
In the News
David Morris Featured for Arrival to Foley's Salt Lake City Office
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Morris is highlighted across legal press for his recent arrival to the firm.
July 10, 2025
In the News
Ann Marie Uetz Comments on Automotive Supply Chain Approach to Evolving Tariff Environment
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Ann Marie Uetz shared perspective from the automotive supply chain amid the evolving trade environment in the Crain's Detroit article, "Ford, Stellantis tighten terms on suppliers as tariff costs add up."