Lacktman, Ferrante Discuss Proposed Legislation Aimed at Combatting Substance Abuse
March 5, 2018
mHealthIntelligence
Partner Nate Lacktman and Senior Counsel Thomas Ferrante were quoted in an mHealthIntelligence article, “Congress Turns to Telemedicine to Take on Substance Abuse Epidemic,” about two bills pending in Congress that would ease restrictions on the prescribing of controlled substances to patients in telehealth-based drug treatment programs.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
Lacktman and Ferrante said current federal law does not per se prohibit the use of telemedicine to prescribe controlled substances, and that a provider may do so if he or she has conducted at least one in-person exam of the patient or meets a ‘practice of telemedicine’ exception to the law’s in-person exam requirement. The problem, they said, is that the ‘practice of telemedicine’ exceptions in the law are very narrow, highly technical, and simply outdated.
“The practice of telemedicine has evolved exponentially in the decade since the [federal law] was passed, and the regulations fail to account for how legitimate telemedicine services are delivered today,” the pair said. “For that reason, the exceptions do not easily align with direct-to-patient service models frequently sought by patients in areas such as telepsychiatry or substance use disorder treatment. In addition, there is a nationwide shortage of psychiatrists and board certified substance abuse addiction specialists, coupled with the nation’s tragic opioid crisis, making telemedicine services an attractive resource.”
Lacktman and Ferrante’s quotes were sourced from their recent Health Care Law Today blog post, which can be found here.
Related News
December 18, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on HHS Proposed Rule Limiting Gender-Affirming Care
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget commented on a recent proposal from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the Law360 article, “HHS Proposes Hospital Ban On Gender Care For Minors.”
December 12, 2025
In the News
Foley Chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal Talks Firm Strategy and Growth, Featured in Media for Reelection
Foley & Lardner LLP Chairman and CEO Daljit Doogal is featured in The American Lawyer article, “Foley Board Taps Daljit Doogal for Second Term as Chair and CEO,” for his reelection to a second four-year term.
December 11, 2025
In the News
Carrie Hoffman Comments on SCOTUS Arbitration Jurisdiction Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Carrie Hoffman commented on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear an arbitration jurisdiction case in the Law360 article, "High Court Arb. Jurisdiction Case May Impact W&H Cases."