Murray Quoted in Washington Business Journal About Amazon’s Protest of Cloud Computing Contract Award
November 26, 2019
Washington Business Journal
Partner Frank Murray was quoted in a Washington Business Journal article, “Amazon’s JEDI protest relies heavily on Trump. But it might not get to argue that point,” about what evidence the Court of Federal Claims might consider in Amazon Web Services battle to overturn the Pentagon’s award of a $10 billion cloud-computing contract to arch-rival Microsoft. Amazon has argued that President Trump’s antipathy for Jeff Bezos was a factor in the award and wants to submit videos of Trump rallies into the record.
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
People
Related News
July 21, 2025
In the News
Nicholas O'Keefe Assesses 'Golden Share' in US Steel Deal
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Nicholas O'Keefe commented on the 'golden share' arrangement included as part of the approval of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel in Agenda, a Financial Times publication.
July 18, 2025
In the News
Matt Caplan Featured for Arrival to Foley – 'It's an exciting time'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Matt Caplan is highlighted across press for his recent arrival to the firm's San Francisco office.
July 18, 2025
In the News
David Rosen on FDA's CRL Release – 'It hasn't happened in the past'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen commented on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's decision to publish a package of complete response letters to pharmaceutical companies in the PharmaVoice article, "Why FDA’s CRL release could open the door to lawsuits against pharma."