Murray Quoted in Washington Business Journal About Amazon’s Protest of Cloud Computing Contract Award
November 26, 2019
Washington Business Journal
Partner Frank Murray was quoted in a Washington Business Journal article, “Amazon’s JEDI protest relies heavily on Trump. But it might not get to argue that point,” about what evidence the Court of Federal Claims might consider in Amazon Web Services battle to overturn the Pentagon’s award of a $10 billion cloud-computing contract to arch-rival Microsoft. Amazon has argued that President Trump’s antipathy for Jeff Bezos was a factor in the award and wants to submit videos of Trump rallies into the record.
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
People
Related News
November 7, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Breaks Down SCOTUS Tariff Case Arguments
Foley & Lardner partner Gregory Husisian commented on oral arguments in a pivotal trade case before the U.S. Supreme Court in the SupplyChainDive article, "Supreme Court questions Trump’s tariff powers in landmark case."
November 5, 2025
In the News
Louis Lehot and Brian Wheeler Publish Analysis of Private Equity Liquidity Trends
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Louis Lehot and Brian Wheeler authored the article, “Private equity’s new liquidity playbook: creativity now rivals capital,” published in the December 2025 issue of Financier Worldwide Magazine.
November 4, 2025
In the News
Stuart Fross and Leslie Pinney Contribute Chapter to Private Credit Handbook
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Stuart Fross and senior counsel Leslie Pinney contributed a chapter on private credit funding to Global Legal Insights Private Credit 2026.