Murray Quoted in Washington Business Journal About Amazon’s Protest of Cloud Computing Contract Award
26 November 2019
Washington Business Journal
Partner Frank Murray was quoted in a Washington Business Journal article, “Amazon’s JEDI protest relies heavily on Trump. But it might not get to argue that point,” about what evidence the Court of Federal Claims might consider in Amazon Web Services battle to overturn the Pentagon’s award of a $10 billion cloud-computing contract to arch-rival Microsoft. Amazon has argued that President Trump’s antipathy for Jeff Bezos was a factor in the award and wants to submit videos of Trump rallies into the record.
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
“I can guarantee you that the Trump rally is not part of the administrative record,” Murray said. “So what you have to do as a protester at the Court of Federal Claims is make a motion to supplement the administrative record to bring in outside evidence and argue that it’s needed by the judge to resolve the issues in dispute.”
That’s where lawyers for both AWS and the government are expected to have their fiercest legal confrontations: whether the president’s comments should be counted as evidence in an evaluation of the acquisition process, Murray said.
Murray said he did not know of a legal precedent that involving the political volatility or the animus attributed to one company that is featured in the JEDI case. But it might not matter, given the bias argument likely won’t be a determining factor of the case, but rather a supplementing one. “I do think, in some regards, that this is very unusual, uncharted territory,” he said. “I still think that to the extent that the bias argument gets traction, it still needs to find some footing in the evaluation record.”
(Subscription required)
People
Related News
14 February 2025
In the News
Brian Wheeler Joins Podcast to Discuss Legal Journey
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Brian Wheeler joined the Hsu Untied podcast to discuss his legal career.
14 February 2025
In the News
Pavan Agarwal Featured in Leadership Q&A – 'Reflecting our firm’s core values drives me to do my best'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Pavan Agarwal is featured by Law.com for his career journey, legal practice, and leadership in the article, “How I Made Practice Group Chair: ‘Keep Listening and Keep Learning,’ Says Pavan Agarwal of Foley & Lardner.”
14 February 2025
In the News
Judith Waltz on Trump Administration Deregulation Order, Impact on CMS
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Judith Waltz commented on the Trump administration's executive order requiring federal agencies cut ten regulations for each newly created one in the Modern Healthcare article, "CMS may evade Trump's sweeping deregulation order."