Lee Discusses Implications of Washington Redskins Name Change
July 16, 2020
Corporate Counsel
Of Counsel Andrew Lee was quoted in the Corporate Counsel article, “With Name Change, Redskins’ In-House Counsel Must Consider Trademark Uses, Sponsorship Agreements,” about the far-reaching impact of the Washington Redskins changing its name.
The team announced this week that it would retire its name and rebrand amid growing external pressures.
The rebranding process will be much like any other corporate name change, Lee said. “In the sports world, particularly in the NFL, there is value and activation around a team’s name and logo.”
Legally, there is a good reason for not having retired the Redskins name and logo. The name and logo have been a trusted source to the consuming public. “But there’s a historical meaning that predates that use and offends a growing segment of that consuming public, so the entity is also perceived as being a source or origin of that offense—a good reason to make a change regardless of whether the courts say you can keep the name as a registered trademark,” Lee said.
Related News
December 3, 2025
In the News
Vanessa Miller Assesses Automotive Tariff Impact on Trucking Industry
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Vanessa Miller discussed the ongoing disruption in trucking demand resulting from recent automotive tariffs in the TruckingDive article, “Tariffs swing volumes up and down for auto haulers.”
November 28, 2025
In the News
Cassandra Aubert Assesses Circuit Split on SEC Disgorgement Authority
Foley & Lardner LLP associate Cassandra Aubert commented on the growing scrutiny around the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission's disgorgement authority in the Bloomberg Law's article, “SEC Power to Recoup Illegal Profits at Risk as Justices Eye Case."
November 25, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian Analyzes SCOTUS Tariff Case
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Gregory Husisian appeared in a SupplyChainBrain video interview to discuss the U.S. Supreme Court case on the Trump administration’s imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and options the administration can consider should the court strike them down.