Discussing the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. Prometheus to reject two patents on a method for monitoring a patient’s blood to determine appropriate drug dosage as well as the decision’s potential to affect the profitability of personalized medicine, Partner Courtenay Brinckerhoff said the rejection is a disruption of the status quo that may result in less funding for research. First published in an article that appeared in Reuters, Ms. Brinckerhoff’s comments later appeared in additional publications including the Chicago Tribune, Yahoo! News, BioPortfolio and The Huffington Post.
People
Related News
August 8, 2025
In the News
Gregory Husisian and David Simon Uncover the High Stakes of Tariff Evasion
Foley & Lardner LLP partners Gregory Husisian and David Simon are featured for their insights on how the U.S. government is cracking down on tariff evaders in the Newsweek article, "America Is Making Billions From Catching 'Tariff Cheaters.'"
August 7, 2025
In the News
Kyle Faget Weighs in on Trump Pharma Tariffs
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Kyle Faget assessed the Trump administration's implementation of import tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry in the Pharma Life Sciences article, "Trump's pharma import tariffs threaten drug pricing, generics."
August 5, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui on Health Data Sharing Plan – 'I would expect the FTC to be heavily involved'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui addressed a new health care data sharing initiative announced by the federal government in the Bloomberg Law article, "Digital Data-Sharing Plan Tests Limits of Health Privacy Rules."