In litigation to establish inventorship of the CRISPR gene editing technique, the Fed. Circuit provided additional guidance on how to determine when conception of an invention has occurred.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/2338726?nl_pk=95cd90ef-6b5f-45a4-a80b-037d2c8892f4&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ip&utm_content=2025-05-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=0?copied=1
“The appropriate analysis should turn on whether [CVC’s] scientists ‘had formed the idea of their use for that purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice’ — more than a ‘general hope,’ but less than knowing with certainty that the invention would work.”

Author(s)
Related Insights
May 29, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Keep Wining: Franchise Statute Opens Door to Protections for Missouri Wine Distributor
The Eighth Circuit recently applied a novel, broad reading of the Missouri Franchise Act granting franchise protection to distributors…
May 28, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
U.S. and International Antitrust Agencies Signal Aggressive Antitrust Enforcement in Procurement, Consumer Products, and Labor Markets
As we previously reported on April 15 and April 28, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are increasingly…
May 28, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Rethinking University Research: Innovating the Innovation Ecosystem to Support Life Sciences and Personalized Medicine
Personalized medicine—tailoring treatments to individual patients based on their genetic makeup, lifestyle, and environment—is…