Ethics Drama of 2007: Qualcomm, Congress and the Pressure to Waive Attorney Client Privilege
December 4, 2007
The patent infringement lawsuit of Qualcomm v. Broadcom began innocuously and ended with a court order finding the plaintiff and its counsel knowingly violated a duty to disclosure, honesty, and good faith. The court found that conduct constituting discovery abuse exposed counsel to career imperiling orders, and the company to millions of dollars in sanctions. The company and its outside counsel each hired separate counsel, and in the resulting sanctions hearing attorney client privilege was threatened. Key leaders for Qualcomm including their General Counsel resigned. This session, presented by Kenneth S. Klein, Foley & Lardner LLP, explored how events came to this juncture, and what lessons can be learned to avoid it happening again.
Related Insights
January 12, 2026
Energy Current
Ninth Circuit Hears Oral Argument in Challenge to California Climate Disclosure Laws SB 261 and SB 253; No Ruling Yet
On January 9, 2026, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument in a challenge to…
January 12, 2026
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Cannabis and Employment Law: The Year Ahead in 2026
As we move into 2026, legal frameworks surrounding cannabis continue to evolve across the jurisdictions in ways that can directly or…
January 12, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
How Chinese Utility Models Fit Into Global IP Strategies
Utility models have historically attracted less attention than conventional invention patents in multinational patent portfolio planning. Yet with an enduring and, in many cases, growing Chinese presence in key sectors including electric vehicles, batteries, semiconductors, renewables, clean tech and telecommunications, utility models are gaining renewed strategic relevance.