Employee activism is on the rise, impacting businesses of all sizes and touching on employment and labor law risks that are not always immediately evident. This webinar will explore the key issues driving this trend and the various legal concerns raised as well as provide practical strategies for managing its potential impact, including reputational damage, legal challenges, and internal conflict.
Join us to learn how to navigate the complexities of employee activism and mitigate potential risks to your organization by:
- Understanding the drivers of employee activism
- Identifying potential risks for your organization
- Learning legal considerations and best practices
- Developing effective communication and response strategies
Event Recording
Click here to access the PPT presentation.
Relevant Articles
- https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2025/01/president-trump-ends-affirmative-action-requirements-for-federal-contractors/
- https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2025/01/president-trumps-rescission-executive-order/
- https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2025/01/immigration-law-enforcement-i-9-inspections-site-visits/
- https://www.foley.com/insights/publications/2025/01/president-trumps-inauguration-day-immigration-executive-orders/
People
Related Insights
February 13, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
State AG Letters Highlight Antitrust and Consumer Protection Risks of Collaborative ESG Efforts
The AGs characterize these efforts as a series of agreements among competitors that may reduce economic output and competition, increase prices, and mislead the public, potentially in violation of federal and state antitrust and consumer protection laws.
February 13, 2026
Energy Current
The AI Power Crunch: 3 Ways Renewable Developers Can Win the "Data Center" Game
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is hungry for power. By 2030, data centers could consume nearly 9% of all U.S. electricity[1]. This demand…
February 13, 2026
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Invalidates Biden-Era HSR Reforms
In invalidating the Biden-era changes, the court held that the FTC failed to show that the changes’ benefits outweighed their significant costs to merging parties, in particular, to the vast majority (historically, 92%) of parties whose transactions require no antitrust investigation whatsoever.