Ferris Quoted on Sixth Session of the Annual U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue
July 16, 2014
People’s Daily (China)
Partner Richard Ferris was quoted in a People’s Daily (China) article on July 16, 2014, about the sixth session of the annual U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue, which took place in Beijing in July. Ferris, who is co-chair of the U.S. Council for International Business China Committee, was quoted saying Chinese President Xi Jinping’s primary objectives of ‘maintaining mutual respect, thinking big, and focusing on building a new model for the major-country relationship in order to achieve common ground and resolve differences in the China-US relationship’ are laudable and consistent with U.S. business community goals.
Ferris noted there are always complexities in major-country relations, which were made more complex in recent times because of security concerns. However, he commented that recent U.S.-China initiatives, such as negotiations to boost bilateral investment, streamlining travel procedures between the countries, intensified cooperation to address environmental challenges and similar activities, serve as opportunities to realize President Xi’s objectives.
Ferris noted there are always complexities in major-country relations, which were made more complex in recent times because of security concerns. However, he commented that recent U.S.-China initiatives, such as negotiations to boost bilateral investment, streamlining travel procedures between the countries, intensified cooperation to address environmental challenges and similar activities, serve as opportunities to realize President Xi’s objectives.
相关新闻
2025年12月3日
新闻速递
范妮莎·米勒评估汽车关税对卡车运输业的影响
福里尔·拉德纳律师事务所合伙人范妮莎·米勒在《TruckingDive》的报道《关税导致汽车运输量波动》中,探讨了近期汽车关税政策引发的卡车运输需求持续动荡现象。
2025年11月28日
新闻速递
卡桑德拉·奥伯特评析美国证券交易委员会追缴权限的司法分歧
福里尔·拉德纳律师事务所律师卡桑德拉·奥伯特在彭博法律的报道《最高法院关注案件,SEC追缴非法利润权力面临风险》中,就美国证券交易委员会(SEC)追缴非法利润权力的日益严格审查发表了评论。
2025年11月25日
新闻速递
格雷戈里·胡西安解析最高法院关税案
福里与拉德纳律师事务所合伙人格雷戈里·胡西安接受SupplyChainBrain视频专访,就美国最高法院审理特朗普政府依据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)征收关税的案件发表见解,并探讨若法院裁定关税措施无效,政府可采取的应对方案。