Overly and Tantleff Quoted on Yahoo Data Breach
September 27, 2016
Fortune | The Wall Street Journal
Partner Aaron Tantleff was quoted in a Fortune article, “Yahoo Could Face Legal Trouble Over Delay in Disclosing Hack,” on September 23, 2016. The article discussed the Yahoo data breach and questioned why the company waited nearly two years before informing the public. Tantleff commented on the varying state notice periods and explained how some states require companies to notify customers about data breaches within 30 or 45 days, while others use more general language, such as “as soon as expedient.” However, Tantleff said state laws make allowance for law enforcement proceedings, meaning it’s possible Yahoo informed the FBI about the hack and the agency instructed the company to wait before going public with the news.
In addition, Partner Michael Overly was quoted in a Wall Street Journal article, “Yahoo Breach: Senators Demand Answers,” on September 27, 2016. The article discussed the letter from six Democratic U.S. senators to Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seeking answers about Yahoo’s data breach, specifically the timeline and a list of affected services. Overly explained that it is not uncommon for consumers to be notified years after a breach, but the delay can create problems for consumers and diminish the intended effects of breach-notification laws. He was quoted saying, “If the time delay between breach and the company learning about it is two years, the horse has not only escaped the barn, but the barn has fallen from disuse.”
In addition, Partner Michael Overly was quoted in a Wall Street Journal article, “Yahoo Breach: Senators Demand Answers,” on September 27, 2016. The article discussed the letter from six Democratic U.S. senators to Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer seeking answers about Yahoo’s data breach, specifically the timeline and a list of affected services. Overly explained that it is not uncommon for consumers to be notified years after a breach, but the delay can create problems for consumers and diminish the intended effects of breach-notification laws. He was quoted saying, “If the time delay between breach and the company learning about it is two years, the horse has not only escaped the barn, but the barn has fallen from disuse.”
人
相关新闻
2025年12月3日
新闻速递
范妮莎·米勒评估汽车关税对卡车运输业的影响
福里尔·拉德纳律师事务所合伙人范妮莎·米勒在《TruckingDive》的报道《关税导致汽车运输量波动》中,探讨了近期汽车关税政策引发的卡车运输需求持续动荡现象。
2025年11月28日
新闻速递
卡桑德拉·奥伯特评析美国证券交易委员会追缴权限的司法分歧
福里尔·拉德纳律师事务所律师卡桑德拉·奥伯特在彭博法律的报道《最高法院关注案件,SEC追缴非法利润权力面临风险》中,就美国证券交易委员会(SEC)追缴非法利润权力的日益严格审查发表了评论。
2025年11月25日
新闻速递
格雷戈里·胡西安解析最高法院关税案
福里与拉德纳律师事务所合伙人格雷戈里·胡西安接受SupplyChainBrain视频专访,就美国最高法院审理特朗普政府依据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)征收关税的案件发表见解,并探讨若法院裁定关税措施无效,政府可采取的应对方案。