在模糊的公司法律办公室背景下,一位棕色长发、身穿白色西装外套、外罩蓝色上衣的女士对着镜头微笑。

凯瑟琳-O-比蒂

合作伙伴

凯瑟琳-O-比蒂

合作伙伴

Katharine O. Beattie represents clients in litigation and provides counseling on federal and state labor and employment matters, including discrimination and harassment, leaves of absence, wage and hour disputes on an individual and class-wide basis, employee classification, wrongful termination, trade secret protection, and the enforcement of noncompetition and nondisclosure agreements. She is a partner in the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.

Kate handles employment litigation before federal and state courts, arbitrators, and administrative agencies, including state fair employment and human rights agencies. She has also represented clients in cases pertaining to the False Claims Act, insider trading, and shareholder disputes.

Kate counsels clients on a wide variety of employment issues, such as leaves of absence, independent contractor and employee classification, wage and hour law compliance, reasonable accommodation for disabled employees, employee discipline and termination, and the protection of trade secrets and confidential information. She conducts internal investigations of harassment and discrimination claims, wage and hour compliance issues, whistleblower claims, and allegations of ethics and code of conduct violations. She also provides training on anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies and procedures as well as effective management practices.

Kate frequently provides employment and labor guidance on corporate merger and acquisition transactions, and regularly negotiates and drafts executive employment, separation, and related agreements on behalf of both publicly and privately held companies.

In her labor practice, she advises clients on a range of collective bargaining issues, and represents clients before the National Labor Relations Board with respect to unfair labor practice charges and union election proceedings.

Kate was vice president, Employment & Litigation Counsel at NTT DATA, Inc., where she was responsible for legal matters in North America and India. In this role, Kate managed commercial and employment litigation, provided human resources and business executives with employment law advice and counseling on all aspects of employment law, handled internal investigations, training, and compliance, and supported all phases of corporate merger and acquisition transactions.

In law school, Kate served as a special assistant attorney general in the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General’s Office, where she represented state agencies before state courts. Her experience also includes four years as a legislative aide in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.

奖项和表彰

  • Chairperson, Read to a Child, Boston Regional Board
  • Selected by her peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© in the field of Litigation – Labor and Employment (2022-2024)
  • Massachusetts Super Lawyers, Employment Lit: Defense (2018-2021)
  • Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Top Women of Law (2019)
  • Board Member, Read to a Child, Boston Regional Board
  • Alumna, Boston Chamber of Commerce Women’s Leadership Program (2010-2011)

附属机构

  • Member, Boston Bar Association’s Labor & Employment Steering Committee

演讲和出版物

  • 首席财务官领导委员会 2025 年春季会议 "首席财务官的法学院 "专题讨论小组成员(2025 年 6 月 2 日)
  • Speaker, “Whistleblower Protections: Navigating Health Care Employment & Labor Rights,” Foley & Lardner Webinar (January 8, 2025)
  • Co-author, “Massachusetts: Proceed With Caution – New Vaccination Criteria for Hospitals and Other Licensed Health Facilities,” Health Care Law Today (November 7, 2023)
  • Speaker, “What You Need to Know About the New Massachusetts Paid Family Medical Leave,” Boston Women in Finance (June 12, 2019)
  • Speaker, “Wage and Litigation Update,” MSADA CEO and CEFO Forum (December 13, 2018)
  • Speaker, “ASA Law Conference,” ASA Staffing Law Conference (May 10, 2018)
  • Speaker, “New England Construction Risk Conference,” Willis Towers Watson
  • Co-author, “Plan For Recession Layoffs Now To Avoid Delay and Liability,” Law 360 (August 25, 2022)
  • Quoted, “How to Make Telecommuting Work During a Pandemic,” Emaxx Group, (March 24, 2020)
  • Quoted, “Mass. Noncompete Law Overhaul Not As Strict As It Seems,” Law 360 (August 17, 2018)
  • Co-author, “Supreme Court Rules on Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements,” Massachusetts Auto Dealer Magazine (June 1, 2018)
  • Quoted, “Workplace Marijuana Rules Confronted in Discrimination Cases,” National Law Journal (July 25, 2017)
Four women sit around a table in a law office setting, engaged in conversation and collaborating on intellectual property law matters, with a laptop and documents visible.
2025 年 10 月 6 日 劳动与就业法视角

Beyond Maternity Leave: How Employment Law is Catching Up with Women’s Health Priorities

Not long ago, paid maternity leave was a cutting-edge benefit for women in the workforce. Today, the conversation is expanding beyond just maternity leave as state legislatures and employers consider new workplace protections for women’s broader health needs — ranging from fertility treatments to reproductive loss and menopause.
2025 年 9 月 17 日 交易与胜利

Foley 为 CloserStill Media 收购 Billington Cybersecurity 提供顾问服务

Foley & Lardner LLP 律师事务所为市场领先的商业活动、展览和会议制作商 CloserStill Media 收购美国领先的公共部门网络安全会议和活动组织者 Billington Cybersecurity 担任法律顾问。
2025 年 10 月 16 日 活动

首席财务官领导力会议:首席财务官法学院

加入 Foley & Lardner LLP 和首席财务官领导委员会于 10 月 16 日在波士顿举办的首席财务官法学院--一个旨在帮助高级财务管理人员在当今复杂的商业环境中应对关键法律挑战和管理风险的实用课程。
2025 年 6 月 2 日 活动

首席财务官领导力会议:首席财务官法学院

首席财务官法学院课程旨在帮助您了解并掌握瞬息万变的法律问题,这些问题直接影响到您的业务健康和职业生活。Foley & Lardner LLP 的合伙人将与您分享 2025 年的主要法律更新。 
September 19, 2024 Events

Law School for CFOs

We are excited to host this highly regarded event offered in collaboration with the Boston Chapter of the CFO Leadership Council and presented by Foley & Lardner LLP at our Boston office.
美国最高法院大楼的正面立面,高耸的柱廊、雕像以及"法律面前人人平等"的铭文,始终激励着那些专注于知识产权法律事务的律师事务所。
September 9, 2024 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives

No More Chevron Deference: What Does This Mean for Employers?

From 1984 until June 2024, a reviewing court had to defer to a federal agency’s reasonable interpretation of ambiguous statutes, even if the court would have interpreted the statute differently.