Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?

19 November 2019 Dashboard Insights Blog
Author(s): Jeffrey A. Soble

More and more, when people discuss the automotive industry, they refer to “mobility”.  The word is not new. Even a quick online search will find it used as far back as 2016.  Back then, an early proposed definition was “Technologies and services that enable people and goods to move around more freely.” Today, it seems to mean so much more. In fact, November 18-21, the Automobility LA conference will address a wide variety of issues all about mobility. And, now it can be defined as “a user-centric concept – recognizing that transportation products and services must be responsive to the needs, habits, and preferences of consumers.”

From barely defined to a multiday conference in just three years. Mobility may just be taking over the auto industry.

A great example of the breadth of mobility is PlanetM from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. As PlanetM explains, it “is Michigan's mobility initiative representing the collective mobility efforts across the state. PlanetM connects you to Michigan’s mobility ecosystem — the people, places and resources dedicated to the evolution of transportation mobility.” Among other things, PlanetM works to bring startups in the mobility sector together. Autos and technology are merging into mobility. As noted by WardsAuto, we are witnessing a convergence, “Emerging technologies and businesses across multiple industries are in the process of converging.”

But where is this getting the industry? The Center for Automotive Research took a stab at answering that question in their August 2016 report, The Impact of New Mobility Services on the Automotive Industry. What was clear even then was that there were multiple different ways that the industry was being disrupted: Ridehailing, Ridesharing, Carsharing, Bikesharing, Microtransit, Mobility-as-a-Service and Shared Autonomous Vehicles were all considered part of the mobility platform. The mobility options are only growing. As the world (developed and developing) becomes more urban and more connected, the intersection of vehicles, infrastructure, transportation, commuting and technology will only become larger. 

Vehicle ownership is on the decline as vehicle usership seems to be on the upswing. Subscription services are arriving to allow people to use vehicles, but not own them.  In 2018, a Cox Automotive study showed that 40% of consumers agreed that vehicle ownership is not necessary for transportation. There is no reason to think that number is going to fall. People need to get from point A to point B. But how they get there, how they are mobile, is evolving and changing not just the automotive industry, but the transportation industry and the technology industry.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services