In its recent ruling in KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., the Supreme Court rejected the strict test for invalidating a patent based on obviousness. As a result, not only will it become easier to declare an invention obvious, it also makes it unclear what test should be used in such cases. George Best, a patent litigator in Foley’s Washington, D.C. office, was quoted in the article, “A Murky Ruling: High Court’s Decision on Obviousness Leaves Patent Attorneys Scratching their Heads” in the July 2007 issue of InsideCounsel. Best was quoted as saying that because of this decision, it will be harder to get a patent issued by the Patent Office and easier to get a patent invalidated in litigation.
Related News
June 6, 2025
In the News
David Rosen Comments on FDA, Compounder Conflict Over Drug Shortages
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen highlighted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's drug shortage list in the BioSpace article, "Post-Chevron Legal Battles: Three Key Cases to Watch."
June 5, 2025
In the News
Michael Bennett and Zack Flagel Explore Pro Tennis Antitrust Battle
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys Michael Bennett and Zack Flagel assess the antitrust litigation embroiling professional tennis in their LawInSport article, "Break(ing) Point? The Antitrust Battle that Could Transform Professional Tennis."
June 4, 2025
In the News
Foley Attorneys Explore IP Considerations for AI-Generated Logos
Foley & Lardner LLP attorneys Von Bryant, Norm Rich, and Alex Liederman authored the Bloomberg Law article, "AI-Generated Logos Require Careful Steps to Protect IP Rights."