Foley Partner Richard Stoll authored an article that examines the practicality of rule deadlines imposed upon the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), saying that EPA regulations issued with undue haste are often full of ambiguities and gaps that can potentially create confusion and result in judicial reversal. Stoll notes that rushed rules can also result in the omission of critical scientific, economic and technical factors, calling into question whether EPA deadline suits have outlived their usefulness.
Click here to read the complete article.
Author(s)
Related Insights
June 20, 2025
Foley Career Perspectives
Foley Juneteenth Program: Exploring the Hidden History to Further Our Mutual Understanding
In celebration of Juneteenth, Foley & Lardner welcomed Dr. Deirdre Cooper Owens, author and historian, for a firmwide virtual program on…
July 10, 2025
Events
Mandatory Roth Catch-up
Join Foley’s upcoming webinar on mandatory Roth catch-up contributions effective January 1, 2026. Learn how the new rules impact high earners, what guidance exists, and practical tips for plan compliance.
June 20, 2025
Foley Viewpoints
Federal Court Enjoins Former Franchisees and Two Related Entities from Competing Against Franchisor
A federal court recently granted in part and denied in part a franchisor’s motion to enjoin the post-termination activities of its former…