On August 21, 2007, the USPTO issued final rules (1) limiting the number of continuation applications that can be filed without justification, and also (2) limiting the number of claims that can be presented in a given application without having to provide a detailed patentability analysis.
The USPTO believes that the new rules will improve the patent examination process and relieve the overwhelming backlog of pending patent applications, but may have underestimated the substantive impact the rules will have on patent Applicants.
Reprinted with permission from Portfolio Media, Inc.
Author(s)
Related Insights
December 5, 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Ninth Circuit Ruling Upholds Employee Speech Amid Stalled NLRB
Like it or not, social media has become the backdrop of almost everything we do. It's how many people read the news, interact with…
December 5, 2025
Legal News: International Trade Enforcement & Compliance
What Every Multinational Should Know About … Preserving the Right to IEEPA Tariff Refunds
Any company that has imported goods subject to the Trump administration’s fentanyl-based tariffs or reciprocal tariffs — i.e., the tariffs levied pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (the IEEPA tariffs) — needs to consider filing an action in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to preserve the possibility of recovering refunds of these tariffs.
December 4, 2025
Manufacturing Industry Advisor
Foley Automotive Update
Analysis by Julie Dautermann, Competitive Intelligence Analyst Foley is here to help you through all aspects of rethinking your long-term…