Law360 highlighted cases to keep an eye on in 2013 before the state's Supreme Court, including Ritchie v. Rupe. Partner Richard A. Tulli provided comment on this case.
Ritchie v. Rupe "caught corporate lawyers by surprise," and has the potential to change the way those attorneys advise clients facing minority shareholder oppression claims, Mr. Tulli said. "This case raises the question of how much corporations have to do to help facilitate the sale of stock and what risks it has to take on."
Subscribers can access the full article here.
Related News
July 18, 2025
In the News
Matt Caplan Featured for Arrival to Foley – 'It's an exciting time'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Matt Caplan is highlighted across press for his recent arrival to the firm's San Francisco office.
July 18, 2025
In the News
David Rosen on FDA's CRL Release – 'It hasn't happened in the past'
Foley & Lardner LLP partner David Rosen commented on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's decision to publish a package of complete response letters to pharmaceutical companies in the PharmaVoice article, "Why FDA’s CRL release could open the door to lawsuits against pharma."
July 18, 2025
In the News
Aaron Maguregui Highlights Potential Compliance Concerns in Pre-Tax Wellness Claims
Foley & Lardner LLP partner Aaron Maguregui commented in The New York Times article, "Hot Dogs for Insomnia? A Kennedy Aide's Start-Up Can Get You a Tax Break," sharing insight on the growing use of medical necessity letters to support tax-advantaged purchases of wellness products.