Lockerby Authors Amicus Brief Asking Supreme Court to Prevent Removal of “Peace Cross” Memorial from Maryland Intersection

20 June 2019 Media Contact: Jill Chanen News
Partner Michael Lockerby has authored an amicus brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the court-ordered removal of a towering cross-shaped memorial from a busy intersection in Prince Georges County, Maryland. Arguments are scheduled for February 27, 2019.

The memorial was ordered removed or altered last year by the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds that the 40-foot tall Latin cross, established in memory of soldiers who died in World War I, is a predominately Christian symbol and constitutes an endorsement of Christianity.

But Lockerby’s brief, filed December 21, 2018, on behalf of the Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil liberties organization, argues that the Fourth Circuit has misinterpreted the Establishment Clause in a way that threatens citizens’ First Amendment rights to freely exercise their religion. It also says the Fourth Circuit ruling fosters a pervasive bias and hostility to religion and does not reflect the neutrality toward religion required by the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.

“If allowed to stand, the Fourth Circuit’s decision will interfere with religious freedom in a way that would have been unfathomable even by the standards of eighteenth century England – much less those of the twenty-first century United States of America,” Lockerby wrote. “It will also create a precedent that would, for the very first time, transmogrify the First Amendment so that its protections of freedom of religion would be nullified by a mandate that public property be free from any display of religious symbols.”

The marble and concrete structure, flanked by an American flag and decorated with a small star, is known as the Peace Cross. It was built on private land using private funds in 1925 to honor 49 local men who died in World War I, but was eventually turned over to a state agency, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, which has since spent about $217,000 to maintain and renovate it.

In 2014, the American Humanist Association sued to have the Peace Cross removed, asserting that its presence on publicly owned land violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. A federal court judge rejected the claim, ruling that the memorial had a primarily secular purpose and did not improperly endorse religion.

The Fourth Circuit reversed that decision, holding that a Latin cross is a predominately Christian symbol that constitutes an endorsement of that faith. Last November, however, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case.

A ruling is expected in the spring.

Read more here.

Update: On June 20, 2019, in a 7-2 decision that recognized that the “Peace Cross” memorial was not only a religious symbol, but also a national landmark that honors all veterans, the U.S. supreme Court ruled that the constitution does require removal of the memorial.

Related Services

Insights

RCE PTA Carve-Out Resumes After Interference
18 September 2019
PharmaPatents
The Ninth Circuit Expected to Rule that Doctors Can Be Wrong in the Winter v. Gardens False Claims Act Case
18 September 2019
Legal News: Government Enforcement Defense & Investigations
Upcoming Webinar: Maximizing Solar Tax Credits - Navigating the Start of Construction Rules (Part 1)
17 September 2019
Renewable Energy Outlook
When Birds Finally Find a Nest
17 September 2019
Dashboard Insights
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
BRG Healthcare Leadership Conference
06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.
CTeL Telehealth Fall Summit 2019
04-06 December 2019
Washington, D.C.