EU and Japan Aim for Mutual Recognition of Auto Safety Standards

22 July 2013 Dashboard Insights Blog

Automotive trade is key to many trade agreements, and the proposed EU-Japan trade agreement is one of them. The second round of negotiations between the EU and Japan, which is being held in Tokyo, Japan from June 24, 2013 through July 3, 2013, will place much focus on the automotive area.

During the negotiations, the EU and Japan plan to discuss the possibility of agreeing on mutual recognition of automotive safety standards. Currently, a European automaker needs to undertake safety inspections in Japan in order for them to sell cars in Japan, and vice versa. If the EU and Japan can reach an agreement on mutual recognition of safety standards, a European automaker can undertake safety inspections in Europe, using data obtained in Europe, to determine whether their cars meet Japanese safety standards, and vice versa. Through the implementation of such mutual recognition, European and Japanese automakers can save both time and cost that are currently necessary to export cars into each other’s region.

After the talks on mutual recognition of automotive safety standards, the focus of the negotiations will then turn to issues on tariff and non-tariff barriers. The EU currently has 10% tariff on imported cars, and Japan is requesting the abandonment of such tariff. On the other hand, the EU claims that, although Japan has zero tariff on imported cars, Japan has various non-tariff barriers, including distinctive safety and environmental standards. With several European countries being concerned about the increase of Japanese cars being imported into Europe, there will likely be long and tough negotiations on these issues.

As such, there is still much uncertainty in the development of the EU-Japan trade agreement negotiations. In addition, the negotiations will likely be affected by the negotiations that are concurrently being done in connection with the US-EU trade agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (which includes the US and Japan). Despite this uncertainty, it is true that the EU and Japan have started to move to a mutual recognition of automotive safety standards. If this move is actually realized, it will accelerate the import/export of cars between Europe and Japan and will have an impact on US-based auto parts suppliers doing business in these regions.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

CMS Proposes Enhanced Scrutiny over Medicaid Supplemental Payments
20 November 2019
Health Care Law Today
The Purpose of a Corporation
November 2019
Legal News: Business Law
Should This Be a "Mobility" Industry Blog?
19 November 2019
Dashboard Insights
Data Processing Patent Eligibility: Federal Circuit Finds Claims Eligible in KPN v. Gemalto
19 November 2019
IP Litigation Current
PATH Summit 2019
18-20 December 2019
Arlington, VA
Madison CLE Days
18-19 December 2019
Madison, WI
MedTech Impact Expo & Conference
13-15 December 2019
Las Vegas, NV
HFMA MA-RI Annual Compliance Update
12 December 2019
Boston, MA