What Employers Should Know About Sexual Orientation Discrimination

08 November 2013 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog
Author(s): Carrie Hoffman

Yesterday, the Senate approved the Employment NonDiscrimination Act (“ENDA”).  The ENDA would amend Title VII to include sexual orientation and related issues in the definition of protected classes.  Political pundits do not give the ENDA much chance of passing the House.  This is nothing new.  The ENDA has been proposed periodically in Congress since 1994 and has failed to become law each time.  But, here is why employers should take notice – the EEOC’s Strategic Enforcement Plan.

The EEOC has as part of its Strategic Enforcement Plan expansion of Title VII to “address emerging and developing issues.”  According to the Plan, these issues include “coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender [LGBT] individuals under Title VII.”  Much as it has done with litigation over the use of criminal convictions, the EEOC is seeking to push the envelope here.  Employers should expect to see the EEOC accepting charges on sex discrimination with the sexual orientation as the issue. And, the EEOC will be pursuing cases on this basis in an effort to change the law.

At the heart of the EEOC’s position is that the term “sex” includes discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  And, at least one circuit court agreed when it allowed an effeminate gay man’s claims to proceed based on allegations of gender stereotyping.  Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc., 579 F.3d 285 (3rd Cir. 2009).

Employers should not wait for passage of the ENDA to take a hard look at their policies and practices when it comes to issues of sexual orientation and gender identity.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services