Protecting Manufacturing Advancements Is Important for Next-Generation Manufacturers

09 December 2013 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Mark A. Aiello

Manufacturing continues to grow in the United States, fueled primarily by innovations in technology, human capital, and advances in the manufacturing process itself. With the advent of new technologies, particularly technologies that provide an advantage over the competition, next-generation manufacturers must zealously protect its intellectual property and assets associated with such manufacturing technologies.

Next-generation manufacturers are particularly vulnerable when supplying other manufacturers who purchase their goods. If the buyer has the right to inspect the seller’s manufacturing technologies or otherwise has access to the seller’s manufacturing processes, innovative technologies, and proprietary advancements, the rights to protect such intellectual assets may be compromised.

Manufacturing processes, although patentable, should also, or may better, be protected as trade secrets. This is because the process of filing a patent requires disclosing to the world the very secret that necessitates protection. The ephemeral protections of patents (generally 20 years of protection) have led to the protection of manufacturing processes as trade secrets, which ultimately last as long as the confidentiality of such processes can be maintained.

Many manufacturers selling goods may not be aware that their manufacturing processes are being copied. For example, a widget manufacturer, who produces widgets that look identical to a competitor’s, is unlikely to discern whether a competitor has utilized the manufacturer’s proprietary techniques by simply looking at the finished product. Thus, the importance of protecting manufacturing secrets cannot be overemphasized.

Next-generation manufacturers should reassess whether their agreements adequately protect information and observations that become available to its customers or suppliers. One effective tool to protect technological innovations and manufacturing investments is to enter into nondisclosure agreements.

Parties may also protect their intellectual assets and trade secrets through sale or purchasing terms.  Many purchase order terms and conditions contain confidentiality clauses. These types of clauses obligate the contracting parties to maintain the secrecy and confidentiality of all information disclosed during the course of work.

Key inclusions in confidentiality and restrictive use clauses include provisions that require parties to adopt measures to protect the secrecy of confidential or proprietary information and observations that are adequate under the circumstances and that provide for remedies necessary to enforce such terms. In the case of a manufacturer-seller, this may include such things as requiring a camera phone restriction in certain areas of the plant for any employees or agents of a buyer, prohibiting reproduction, copying or disseminating information or observations other than for intended purposes, and an agreement to such terms by individuals granted access to such information and inspection. In addition, the buyer may be granted access only to certain information or facilities.

A common pitfall of many nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements is that they only last as long as the term of the underlying contract, which is commonly three years. Because the intellectual property and assets associated with such manufacturing technologies must be protected after the contractual relationship has concluded, it is vital that the parties carve out a time limitation extending their nondisclosure and confidentiality agreement for the useful life of the protected information. This ensures that the parties are obligated to confidentiality even after the expiration of their supply relationship.

In addition to restricting the use of information, nondisclosure agreements may also provide for a remedy for enforcement. Such inclusions can be in the form of a clause stipulating that any breach of the nondisclosure or confidentiality shall cause irreparable damages impossible of calculation, and stipulates that an injunction may be obtained by the non-breaching party. The remedy may also include a liquidated damages provision.

Indeed, as manufacturing processes evolve, the measures used to protect these processes must evolve too. A carefully drafted nondisclosure agreement is key, but should be used in tandem with other measures to protect next-generation manufacturers. A manufacturer should also consider requiring its employees who have access to confidential information to enter into noncompete or confidentiality agreements, as well. The bottom line is that next-generation manufacturers must actively protect their intellectual property and assets associated with such manufacturing technologies lest they lose such assets to a competitor.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Hatch Comments on DNC-Related Construction Projects in Milwaukee
14 June 2019
Milwaukee Business Journal
Bernard Quoted on Debt-Relief Settlement with ITT Tech Lender
14 June 2019
Wall Street Journal
Dodd and Daughter Profiled in Wisconsin Golf
13 June 2019
Wisconsin Golf
Brinckerhoff Comments on SCOTUS Ruling in Patent Case
11 June 2019
Intellectual Property Magazine
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI