USPTO Issues Proposed Rules on Design Patents to Implement Hague Treaty on Industrial Designs

03 December 2013 PharmaPatents Blog

On November 29, 2013, the USPTO published its proposed rules to implement “the Hague Agreement Concerning International Registration of Industrial Designs.” The changes relate to the design patent provisions of Title I of the Patent Law Treaty Implementation Act (PLTIA). Written comments on the proposed changes to design patent practice are due by January 28, 2014.

Summary of Proposed Changes

As set forth in the Federal Register Notice,  the Hague Agreement “provides that an applicant is entitled to apply for design protection in all member countries and with intergovernmental organizations by filing a single, standardized international design application in a single language.”  Title I of the PLTIA amends portions of 35 USC to implement the terms of the Hague Agreement, and these proposed rules will implement Title I of the PLTIA. According to the Federal Register Notice, these changes are to take effect upon “the entry into force of the Hague Agreement with respect to the United States.”

The Federal Register Notice highlights these eight major changes (other changes also are proposed):

  1. Standardizing formal requirements for international design applications
  2. Establishing the USPTO as an office through which international design applications may be filed
  3. Providing a right of priority with respect to international design applications
  4. Treating an international design application that designates the United States as having the same effect from its filing date as that of a national design application
  5. Providing provisional rights for published international design applications that designate the United States
  6. Setting the patent term for design patents issuing from both national design applications under chapter 16 and international design applications designating the United States to 15 years from the date of patent grant
  7. Providing for examination bythe Office of international design applications that designate the United States
  8. Permitting an applicant’s failure to act within prescribed time limits in an international design application to be excused as to the United States under certain conditions

Weighing in

Practitioners and stakeholders interested in design patent protection may want to review the proposed rules in the context of the PLTIA, and provide any comments to the USPTO by the January 28, 2014 deadline.

Comments can be submitted

  • by email to AC87.comments@uspto.gov
  • by email via the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov)
  • by postal mail addressed to:

Mail Stop Comments—Patents
Commissioner for Patents
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA, 22313–1450
Attention: Boris Milef, Senior PCT Legal Examiner, Office of PCT Legal Administration

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights