The 2014 Annual Automotive OEM-Supplier Relations Study came out in May 2014 and it showed that Japanese OEMs may be rebounding after a couple down years when it comes to their relationships with suppliers. The study, published by Planning Perspectives, Inc. (PPI) relies on the Supplier Working Relations Index®. Up until 2011, Japanese OEMs held a healthy advantage with their suppliers. However, 2011-2013 saw that advantage start to vanish, almost completely. The most recent study suggests that Japanese OEMs may have regained their footing with Toyota, Honda and Nissan finishing first, second and third respectively. German OEMs did just as badly as those here in the United States.
Why does it matter? According to PPI, these relationships have “directly correlated to [an OEM's] profitability and competitiveness.” It can also lead to suppliers providing their “newest technology” and “best pricing” to the OEMs with whom they have the best relationships. Suppliers, not surprisingly put their best resources and best people on the relationships that they value the most.
Some other results include:
GM moved back into the “Poor to Very Poor” range thanks to a dip from 2013. The dip stemmed mostly from less trust from GM’s suppliers.
Nissan was the only OEM to improve in every aspect of the survey.
Chrysler also fell back into the “Poor to Very Poor” range as it dropped in the ratings for the first time in six years.
Toyota improved for the first time in seven years, apparently regaining its footing.
This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.