The FCPA Mandate in a Nutshell

18 March 2015 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog

The consequences of an investigation into bribery allegations can be tricky for any manufacturing company, so it’s important to understand the U.S. anti-bribery provisions. As discussed in our Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) overview, manufacturers participating in international business must be mindful of this federal law. Though many are aware of the FCPA, some do not understand its breadth and depth. Below is a bare-bones breakdown of the FCPA’s scope. While the below outline will help readers understand future posts about FCPA defenses, penalties, and compliance, the FCPA contains many nuances, so you should consult legal counsel to analyze specific facts and circumstances.

Who is Subject to the FCPA?

Generally speaking, the FCPA applies to “domestic concerns” and “issuers.” “Issuers” generally refers to “public companies.” If a domestic or foreign company is either (1) traded on a national stock exchange or (2) traded on the over-the-counter market and required to file periodic reports with the SEC, that company is an “issuer” within the meaning of the FCPA.

“Domestic concerns” can be individuals or business entities. For individuals, a domestic concern is any U.S. resident, national, or citizen. For companies, a domestic concern is one (1) organized under the laws of the United States or one of its states, territories, possessions, or commonwealths or (2) maintaining its principal place of business in the United States.

Anti-Bribery Provisions

The FCPA contains two main thrusts—anti-bribery provisions and accounting provisions. The former prohibits willful and corrupt bribes to “foreign officials” made for “obtaining or retaining business.” Not surprisingly, courts interpret that language broadly.

To violate the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions, a domestic concern or issuer must directly or indirectly pay or offer to pay anything of value to a foreign official to obtain or retain business. Also, any person or entity that violates the FCPA on United States’ soil may be prosecuted under the FCPA.

  • Anything of value essentially means what it sounds like. It goes well beyond a suitcase full of cash. Examples include, but are not limited to, cash, gifts, payment of expenses, services, entertainment, payment for medical treatment, loans, or jobs for third-parties.
  • Foreign officials include government representatives, governmental departments, political parties, officials of political parties, and candidates for political office. Moreover, a bribe made to a third person may violate the FCPA if the person making the payment knows, or disregards red flags, that the payment, or part of the payment, is given to a foreign official.

Books and Records and Internal Control Provisions

To supplement the anti-bribery provisions, the FCPA also imposes financial reporting requirements on issuers. In particular, the FCPA requires issuers to maintain accurate books and records that reflect in reasonable detail‚ accurately and completely‚ transactions and asset dispositions. The FCPA also requires that the “issuer” establish effective systems of internal controls that provide “reasonable assurance” of the following:

  • Transactions are authorized by management;
  • Transactions are recorded properly;
  • Assets are accessed with authorization by management; and,
  • Recorded assets are compared with existing assets at reasonable intervals.

No specific internal controls are required, which provides some flexibility. However, an effective FCPA compliance program is a critical component of “effective” systems of internal controls.

This post covers the basics of the FCPA’s scope. Stay tuned for more on defenses, exceptions, penalties, and keys to complying with the FCPA.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI