Not So Fast My Friend – UAW Membership Rejects Tentative Agreement

5 October 2015 Dashboard Insights Blog

During their press conference on September 15, 2015, UAW President Dennis Williams and Fiat Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne appeared satisfied with the tentative agreement reached after months of bargaining. The two friends smiled while congratulating each other on a job well done. According to Williams, the tentative agreement achieved the three goals he identified at the beginning of the process. However, Williams failed to provide specific details during the press conference regarding the achievement of those goals.

As the UAW leadership met with its locals to explain the specifics, the voices against the tentative agreement began to grow. Those voices turned into action as local after local began rejecting the tentative agreement. The major criticisms included the continuation of a two tier wage structure, lack of a cap on the number of tier 2 workers and concerns over movement of production to other plants or out of the country.

With the failure to ratify the tentative agreement between the UAW and Fiat Chrysler, both sides must figure out a way forward which could include going back to the bargaining table, calling for a strike, or moving on to negotiations with Ford and GM in the hopes that agreements with these automakers will provide more acceptable terms to the UAW members at Fiat Chrysler. Williams may now be rethinking his decision to name Fiat Chrysler as the strike target.

Stay tuned to Dashboard Insights for further developments regarding the status of the negotiations.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services