Does Repeal of the EV Tax Credit Really Matter?

09 November 2017 Dashboard Insights Blog

Last week, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives released their first attempt at tax reform legislation. Buried in the proposed legislation is a repeal of the current tax credit of up to $7500 to purchasers of electrified vehicles that has subsidized early adopters of battery-electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles. The repeal would affect new electric car sales beginning almost immediately, in January 2018. Currently only 10 manufacturers offer vehicles that qualify for the full tax credit, although new offerings are coming out each year.

Under the current tax credit structure, the credit applies to the first 200,000 electric vehicles each manufacturer produces.  After the 200,000 cumulative sales mark, the credit begins to phase out. During the first 6-months of the phase out period, purchasers may redeem 50% of the credit and 25% of the credit during the following 6 months, after which point the credit is no longer available for electric sales from that manufacturer. However, the remaining manufacturers still preserve the ability to redeem tax credits for the first 200,000.

Currently Tesla and General Motors lead the pack in electric vehicle sales with approximately 150,000 and 159,000 cumulative sales, respectively. Each of these companies leveraged the available tax credits to boost sales of costly early electric vehicles.  Meanwhile, battery costs have dropped by 80% over the past 6 years, rewards that the entire automotive industry may reap. At the current sales progression, Tesla and General Motors were each expected to hit the phase out period in 2018.

While the proposed legislative repeal ends the incentive almost immediately, it would only accelerate the cutoff for the largest players by about 18 months.  Certainly consumers and therefore the remaining manufacturers would be hurt by the sudden cutoff of this incentive.  However, with battery production costs continuing to drop, the initial goal of the incentives to drive electric vehicle development has been realized, with manufacturers announcing whole upcoming electric vehicle lineups.

Even if the phase out of the federal tax credit raises electric vehicle prices in the short term, other incentives may make up for the repeal. For example, currently 45 states and DC have some sort of state-level incentive for electric vehicle purchases.  These incentives could be bolstered to make up for the loss in federal promotions.  Additional measures could be adopted from other countries.  Norway, for example, exempts electric vehicles from various taxes and registration fees, making electric vehicles often less expensive to purchase than comparable combustion engine vehicles.  In fact, these incentives may be even more profitable for manufacturers, with the world’s highest per capita demand for electric vehicles, with General Motors raising its price by $5000 for the Ampera E (sister to the Chevy Bolt).  Exempting electric vehicles from state sales taxes would also distribute the benefits of the refund to people lower on the income scale who may not otherwise have $7500 in tax liability to take full advantage of the credit.

While consumers and manufacturers first entering the electric vehicle are invariable hampered by potential repeal of the EV tax credit, in the medium-term, repeal should have little effect on the long-term global trend toward mass EV adoption.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights

Hatch Comments on DNC-Related Construction Projects in Milwaukee
14 June 2019
Milwaukee Business Journal
Bernard Quoted on Debt-Relief Settlement with ITT Tech Lender
14 June 2019
Wall Street Journal
Dodd and Daughter Profiled in Wisconsin Golf
13 June 2019
Wisconsin Golf
Brinckerhoff Comments on SCOTUS Ruling in Patent Case
11 June 2019
Intellectual Property Magazine
Review of 2020 Medicare Changes for Telehealth
11 December 2019
Member Call
2019 NDI Executive Exchange
14-15 November 2019
Chicago, IL
Association for Corporate Counsel Annual Meeting 2019
27-30 October 2019
Phoenix, AZ
Foley's Government Contracts Annual Update
16 October 2019
Liviona, MI