Do You Really Need to go to That Seminar?

02 July 2018 Labor & Employment Law Perspectives Blog

With only a few exceptions (e.g., harassment training in California), employment-related training is voluntary, not mandatory.  We all have so many demands on our time and not enough time in the day to meet them.  As an HR professional, sometimes the last thing you want to do is go to another seminar about harassment, or the ADA, or wage and hour issues.  Is it really important that you do?

The answer is almost certainly yes.  There are two primary reasons for this.  First, knowing the nuts and bolts of key employment issues will help you proactively prevent mistakes that can cost your employer hundreds of thousands, or in some situations, millions of dollars of liability.  For example, if an employee makes a harassment complaint, knowing how to properly investigate and remedy the complaint can be the difference between no liability at all and huge liability.

Second, attending training sessions will serve you well if you ever have to testify about your decisions in an employment-related case.  For example, compare the following answers you might provide when testifying in a discrimination lawsuit, and consider which answer will best establish your credentials and credibility with an arbitrator, judge or jury.

Answer One:   “No, I have not gone to any seminars on employment law issues in my seven years of employment.  No.  Not even one.”

Answer Two:   “Yes, I have attended many seminars and training sessions on employment issues.  For example, in the past two years I have attended seminars on how to comply with the ADA and the FMLA, how to investigate harassment complaints, and how to comply with wage laws.”

Our advice – attend as many employment-related training sessions as you can, and keep track (topic, dates) of the sessions you attend.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Insights