Where Will the Automotive Patent Wars Begin?

09 January 2020 Dashboard Insights Blog
Authors: Chethan K. Srinivasa

Automakers do not want a patent war to break out, and some have even gone to great lengths to employ creative strategies that leverage large patent portfolios without asserting them in litigation. That said, high tech companies developing technology to be integrated in vehicles by automakers may not be so like-minded. Silicon Valley has certainly had its fair share of patent wars over the past decade or two, and may be worn out from them. But automakers and high tech companies in Asia, on the other hand, may have a different appetite when it comes to patent wars.

The number of high profile Chinese entrants in the connected, electric, and autonomous vehicle space is staggering, and there are many more electric vehicle brands that are less well-known. At the same time, there are numerous large high tech companies in China rivaling the Silicon Valley tech companies.  As automakers and high tech companies become more competitive and innovative in similar spaces, situation may soon necessitate some form of litigation.

At a recent auto-focused conference in Asia, there were discussions between Chinese carmakers and high-tech companies, as well as heads of Asian arms of large international companies.  Discussions at the conference stemmed around handling royalty rates for licensing patented wireless technologies being integrated in connected vehicles, which is historically the preferred approach. However, if the licensing rates become untenable and negotiations fall through, then strategies may shift. Indeed, unlike the traditional automakers that were seeking creative, non-assertive strategies for leveraging large patent portfolios, it appears that unless further dialogues proved productive in Asia, a patent war may be the likely outcome.  

As United States-based companies enter the fast-paced connected, electric, and autonomous vehicle market, their IP strategies should factor in the changing business environment and sentiments in Asia in order to remain competitive.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services