Accelerating Trends: Assessing the Supply Chain in a Post-Pandemic World

29 September 2020 Blog
Authors: Ann Marie Uetz Vanessa L. Miller James R. Kalyvas Kathleen E. Wegrzyn
Published To: Dashboard Insights Health Care Law Today Manufacturing Industry Advisor Renewable Energy Outlook Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business

Table of Contents

This report identifies resiliency and innovation considerations for manufacturers and provides frameworks and tools for you to evaluate how those considerations impact your business.

Section 1:  Rethinking China
How manufacturers will analyze right-shoring to consider the benefits and costs of a shift in supply chains away from China and toward other countries.

Section 2:  Resiliency Review
How manufacturers will review processes to ensure a stable and resilient supply chain, focusing on traceability and continuity of supply through diversification or other viable strategies.

Section 3:  Innovation & Efficiency
The accelerated use of new technologies and business processes to facilitate innovation and efficiencies.

Click here to download the full PDF.

 

           
   

SECTION 1

     
   
     
   

Rethinking China

How manufacturers will analyze right-shoring to consider the benefits and costs of a shift in supply chains away from China and toward other countries.

     
           
 

Even before COVID-19, companies were considering whether China continued to make sense for their offshore manufacturing operations.

The U.S.-China trade war caused a sudden and substantial increase in the cost of imported Chinese goods, which catalyzed a shift in U.S. supply chains away from China and toward other countries. In 2019, the total manufactured goods imported to the United States from low-cost countries in Asia (including China), as a percentage of U.S. manufacturing gross output, declined for the first time since 2011.1 This decline is attributed to reduced imports from China and appears to be correlated with the ongoing U.S.-China trade war.

The global COVID-19 pandemic accelerated and compounded these trends by exposing additional supply chain vulnerabilities. Chief among them was an overreliance on a single, primary source of supply. As some observers correctly note, companies that previously diversified their international supplies in response to the U.S.-China trade war were better positioned to mitigate the effects of the pandemic. But, when a company decides to reduce its reliance on China, where does it go?

To determine the right mix of geographic locations for its operations, a company might engage in a “right-shoring” or “best-shoring” analysis, in which a company assesses the most appropriate and effective geographic location or locations for its processes. Right-shoring is a fact-specific analysis driven by commercial, operational, tax, legal, and regulatory conditions in that company’s industry and for that company’s particular product.

Click here for more on right-shoring and considerations for rethinking China.

 

           
   

SECTION 2

     
   
     
   

Resiliency Review

How manufacturers will review processes to ensure a stable and resilient supply chain, focusing on traceability and continuity of supply through diversification or other viable strategies.

     
           
 

Supply Chain Assessment SamplePost-COVID-19, companies are assessing their supply chain processes to determine areas to strengthen and ways to mitigate risk in the future.

The goal is to ensure a stable and resilient supply chain with key focuses on traceability and continuity of supply through diversification or other viable strategies. To assist companies in identifying significant risks and opportunities which can be addressed through a phased approach and prioritized plan to implement changes, we have developed a customized, on-line assessment tool (link to the right). It describes risks and related considerations each company should review regarding supply chain process changes across five key categories:

  • Just in Time (JIT) Production Model
  • Single Source Production Scenarios
  • Contractual Allocation of Risk/Force Majeure
  • Shipping, Warehousing and Inventory Processes
  • In-Housing Certain Operations and Services

Each category is further described in the pages that follow. Upon accessing the on-line assessment tool, you’ll have the opportunity to consider impacts specific to your company, including: Probability of Occurrence (PO) and Probability of Benefit from Change (POBFC), upon which the tool will calculate a Priority Value (PV). You’ll receive a priority level indicator of the importance for your company to address potential issues, and implement viable process change. Customized summary results can be e-mailed (and note that no data is stored).

Click here to access the on-line assessment tool.

Click here for more on the framework to assess and update supply chain processes.

 

           
   

SECTION 3

     
   
     
   

Innovation
& Efficiency 

The accelerated use of new technologies and business processes to facilitate innovation and efficiencies.

     
           
 

Key Innovation & Efficiency OpportunitiesThe use of new technologies and business processes to facilitate innovation and efficiency in the supply chain has been an evergreen process for decades.

Many exciting new technologies and innovative processes have emerged in the last few years, though widespread adoption in the supply chain has been slow as companies manage competing business imperatives and priorities. The coronavirus and its global impact on supply chain and production issues underscored the importance of supply chain resilience. We expect that the lessons learned from coronavirus impacts will accelerate the adoption of certain technologies below to aid in managing enterprise supply chains and production.

We also project that funding priorities within organizations will be adjusted to elevate investments that respond to supply chain resilience issues. To further assist with that prioritization, we examine several areas of innovation and efficiency in supply chain, and provide our guidance on how the various areas and technologies stack up against each other on the following measures: resilience, cost, and maturity. Our findings are shown in the adjacent graph.

1. End-to-End Connectivity/Data Exchange in the Supply Chain


 Resilience    
 Cost      
 Maturity            

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10

Click here for more on end-to-end connectivity/data exchange in the supply chain.

2. Robots and Cobots


 Resilience    
 Cost      
 Maturity            

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on robots and cobots.

3. Upskilling Workers


 Resilience      
 Cost          
 Maturity        

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on upskilling workers.

4. Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, and Advanced Analytics


 Resilience        
 Cost    
 Maturity          

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on artificial intelligence, big data, and advanced analytics.

5. Reconfigurable Manufacturing


 Resilience  
 Cost    
 Maturity          

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on reconfigurable manufacturing.

6. Driverless Transportation


 Resilience    
 Cost  
 Maturity                

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on driverless transportation.

7. 3D Printing


 Resilience      
 Cost              
 Maturity        

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more on 3D printing.

8. Creating Indirect Services Resiliency with Supplier Marketplaces Using Performance-Based Contracts


 Resilience  
 Cost                
 Maturity    

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Click here for more creating indirect services resiliency with supplier marketplaces using performance-based contracts.

------------------------------------------------------------

1 See Patrick Van den Bossche et al., Trade War Spurs Sharp Reversal in 2019 Reshoring Index, Foreshadowing COVID-19 Test of Supply Chain Resilience, KEARNEY, https://www.kearney.
com/documents/20152/5708085/2020%20Reshoring%20Index.pdf/ba38cd1e-c2a8-08ed5095-2e3e8c93e142?t=1586268199800&utm_medium=pr&utm_source=prnewswire&utm_
campaign=2020ReshoringIndex
(last visited June 12, 2020). 

 

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.