Senate Republican Coronavirus Aid Package Top 10 Takeaways

10 September 2020 Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Blog
Authors: Kate M. Merrill Jared B. Rifis

This afternoon, the United States Senate voted on a targeted COVID-19 relief package, which was introduced by Majority Leader McConnell earlier this week.  The bill failed, with a vote of 52-47.  This bill would have provided $500 billion in funding and is an edited version of both the $1 trillion HEALS Act and a separate GOP "skinny" bill, neither of which were considered for floor votes.  The House passed their version of an additional relief package in May, the $3.5 trillion HEROES Act.  It was passed by Democrats on a party line vote and was not taken up by the Senate.  This narrow bill is seen by many as a re-opening for one last chance at a stimulus bill before Congress breaks going into the November elections.  
The Senate's bill: 

  • Reestablishes the Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation program, with payments of $300 per week for unemployed Americans, lasting through December 27, 2020.  The program ceased on July 31, and previously was $600 per week as established by the CARES Act.

  • Provides structure for liability relief and protection, promoting the reopening of the economy and schools.  Hospital workers, business owners, schools, colleges and universities, non-profit institutions, and local government agencies are covered with protections.

  • Mandates exclusive federal causes of action for personal injury claims and medical malpractice claims.  Such provisions would apply to cases related to virus exposure beginning December 1, 2019 and ending October 1, 2024.

  • Allows for the creation of a second round of Paycheck Protection Program funding extending to December 31, this time adding requirements for the application process and narrowing the pool to businesses with 300 or fewer employees.  It would also increase the program's lending authority to $816.6 billion.

  • Contains provisions for school choice long sought by DeVos and some conservatives.  It would provide two years of tax credits for contributions to scholarship-granting organizations, and would also create a program that provides one-time funding to SGOs to provide scholarships for tuition at private schools or to cover other educational expenses.  Education funding totals $105 billion.

  • Forgives the United States Postal Service a $10 billion loan from the Treasury Department that was authorized in the CARES Act.
  • Provides $31 billion for vaccine, therapeutic, and diagnostic development, as well as distribution.  It also provides $2 billion in grants for state stockpiles.

  • Works to improve the Strategic National Stockpile by promoting domestic partnerships with regards to the medical supply chain and stockpiling capacity.

  • Does not provide additional aid to state and local governments, allow for more Provider Relief Funding, or include funding for an additional round of stimulus checks.

  • Is controversial among Republicans, as some are opposed to any additional funding; Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, believe that this bill provides nowhere near enough funding.  

Companies in all sectors of the economy continue to be impacted by COVID-19. Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short- and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives. Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to deliver timely perspectives on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus. Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities. To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.


Related Services