A Supplier’s Post-Pandemic Guide to Overhauling Force Majeure Provisions

12 October 2020 Blog
Authors: Eugenia Wang
Published To: Coronavirus Resource Center:Back to Business Dashboard Insights Manufacturing Industry Advisor

Suppliers have faced unique challenges in keeping their products and services flowing into the marketplace during a pandemic.  In response to COVID-19, suppliers have revisited their default procedures and have developed solutions to these new challenges, including implementing social distancing and improved health practices, designing solutions to comply with various forms of government orders, repairing issues with their supply chain, and reformulating stocking levels.  An overhaul of contract provisions is yet another improvement suppliers can implement to shore up their defenses in case of emergency events.

Shift in Attitudes Towards Force Majeure Provisions

According to a recent survey, 47% of in-house counsel have identified contract complications resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic1.  Accordingly, revisions to contract templates to reduce future complications have made it onto the in-house counsel to-do list.  Prior to the appearance of COVID-19, force majeure was one area of commercial contracting that was commonly glossed over during drafting projects and negotiations.  Now, force majeure provisions are a major focal point for revision by suppliers in their form contracts.

Overhauling Supplier Force Majeure Provisions

In evaluating existing force majeure language in form contracts, suppliers should pay particular attention to the following:

  • Definition of a “Force Majeure Event.”  Suppliers will usually be benefitted when the definition of a Force Majeure Event is drafted broadly.  This means that:

    • Scope of Control.  The supplier should consider defining a force majeure event as one that occurs “beyond the control of the non-performing party,” rather than one that occurs “beyond the reasonable control of the non-performing party.”

    • Non-Exhaustive List.  Any example list of force majeure events should clearly state that the list is not exhaustive by using “without limitation”-type language.  Also, the supplier should consider ending any example list of force majeure events with catch-all language for other “foreseeable” or “unforeseeable” circumstances that cause delays or prevent performance.

    • Contents of List.  A supplier should analyze whether additional events should be added to an example list of force majeure events.  For instance, does the list take into account not only epidemics, pandemics, and viruses, but also COVID-19 specifically, quarantine restrictions, travel bans and government orders?  Does the list need to address an inability to obtain necessary labor, materials or manufacturing facilities?  Does the list need to cover delays in transportation, electrical power outages, or degradation in electronic communications systems?

    • Exclusions.  Besides deciding what circumstances are considered “force majeure,” the supplier may also want to consider inserting language defining what circumstances are not considered “force majeure,” such as a customer’s inability to pay.

  • Impact on Performance.  Suppliers should pay close attention to what impact a force majeure event will have on performance.  Ideally, the supplier will be excused from delays and non-performance under the agreement, will not be deemed to be in breach of the agreement, and will have no liability to the other party to the agreement whatsoever if the delay or non-performance results in whole or in part from a force majeure event.

  • Additional Force Majeure Protections.  Suppliers should ensure that the force majeure section of their form agreements addresses any unique needs they may have in responding to a force majeure event.  A supplier may want to add that in case of a force majeure event, the date of delivery will be extended for a period equal to the time lost because of the delay.  A supplier may also explicitly set forth that it has the right to determine internal use and external allocation of its products and services during a force majeure event.

  • Elimination of Pro-Customer Provisions.  As a final check to a supplier’s force majeure language, the supplier should eliminate any pro-customer provisions that may have inadvertently taken up residence in its existing form language.  Common pro-customer provisions include stringent notice requirements that must be satisfied before force majeure can be claimed, or a right by the customer to terminate the agreement after a supplier claim of force majeure.

Companies in all sectors of the economy continue to be impacted by COVID-19.  Foley is here to help our clients effectively address the short- and long-term impacts on their business interests, operations, and objectives.  Foley provides insights and strategies across multiple industries and disciplines to deliver timely perspectives on the wide range of legal and business challenges that companies face conducting business while dealing with the impact of the coronavirus.  Click here to stay up to date and ahead of the curve with our key publications addressing today’s challenges and tomorrow’s opportunities.  To receive this content directly in your inbox, click here and submit the form.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

1 Uetz, Ann Marie et al., 2020 Global Supply Chain Disruption and Future Strategies Survey Report, https://www.foley.com/-/media/files/insights/publications/2020/09/foley-2020-supply-chain-survey-report-1.pdf (last visited October 6, 2020).

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Authors

Related Services