An End to Draining the Swamp? U.S. EPA, Army Corps Announces Intent to Revise Definition of “Waters of the United States”

10 June 2021 Manufacturing Industry Advisor Blog
Authors: Peter A. Tomasi Sarah A. Slack Dorothy E. Watson Nicholas R. Johnson

Yesterday, the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced their intent to initiate a rulemaking process to promulgate a new definition of “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”) under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). This move was widely anticipated, given that the Trump Administration’s rulemaking efforts on WOTUS – specifically, the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (“NWPR”), issued by the EPA and the Corps in January 2020 – significantly pared back the definition of WOTUS, removing some 60% of previously regulated waters from the agencies’ CWA jurisdiction. The NWPR replaced the 2015 Clean Water Rule, which had established an expansive definition of WOTUS. Although the NWPR is currently the subject of numerous pending legal challenges, it is the law of the land in all 50 states.

The agencies have filed a motion in the pending NWPR litigation requesting that the court remand the current rule back to EPA in light of the proposed rulemaking. If this motion is granted as proposed, the NWPR would remain in effect until the agencies promulgate a revised final rule.

At this point, all we can say for sure is that there is likely to be litigation challenging the agencies’ motion, and any subsequent decision made by the court. It is difficult to predict the timeline or what the courts may do with this, but there is a risk that projects may get caught in the middle of this change in definition.

Practically speaking, the agencies’ announcement throws uncertainty into pending permit applications and No-Permit-Required requests. Foley environmental attorneys are well-positioned to assist with WOTUS issues in this time of significant regulatory uncertainty.

This blog is made available by Foley & Lardner LLP (“Foley” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Foley & Lardner LLP, its partners, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with Foley through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to Foley through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. Foley makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. Foley expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Foley or any of its partners, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.

Related Services

Insights