Foley partner Adam Hepworth is speaking at the upcoming California Society for Healthcare Attorneys’ 2023 Fall Seminar in a session titled “FQHC Affiliations: Partnering with Community-Based Primary Care.”
The session will begin with a brief overview of the fundamentals of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) before addressing the opportunities and challenges involved in health system and medical group partnerships with FQHCs. Topics to be covered include:
- Regulatory requirements tied to HRSA grants, Medicare, and Medicaid
- The value proposition for quality care delivery and reimbursement
- Legal challenges involved in FQHC affiliations
- Models of successful affiliations
To register, please click here.
CLE
The California Society for Healthcare Attorneys is a State Bar of California-Approved MCLE provider. The 2023 Fall Seminar provides 6.5 hours of MCLE credit.
People
Related Insights
21 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
Prescription Drugs: Executive Order Aims to Lower Prices
On April 15, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order (EO) with the aim of reducing the cost of prescription drugs.
21 April 2025
Health Care Law Today
MedTech Round Table: What the Trump Administration Means for Companies and Investors
Foley & Lardner LLP hosted and participated in a MedTech round table of investors and business leaders, including chief executive officers, partners, directors, innovation leads, investment funds managers and partners, and general counsels. There was collective interest in understanding how these MedTech leaders are adjusting to the changing business and regulatory environment under the second Trump administration.
21 April 2025
Labor & Employment Law Perspectives
Supreme Court’s E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera Decision: A Victory for Employers Navigating FLSA Exemptions
In the case at issue, E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera, the court clarified the applicable standard of proof, ruling that employers need only demonstrate by a "preponderance of the evidence," the standard used in most civil cases, that an employee qualifies for an FLSA exemption, rather than the higher more stringent "clear and convincing evidence" standard previously applied by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.